SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bonefish who wrote (1549328)7/24/2025 1:06:17 AM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1582737
 
Bonefish,
It was never intended for what it's used for. A magnet for cheating the system.
Wrong. We had over 125 years of applying the 14th amendment in ways that have been established by the 1898 Wong Kim Ark case. Countless other cases throughout all of American history have been decided based on this interpretation of the 14th amendment, which should be the one and only interpretation that matters. It couldn't be any clearer by the wording.

Yet here you are pretending that the 14th amendment is nothing more than a vehicle for cheating the system. What bullshit.

If you don't like it, then get it amended. Don't expect five Supreme Court justices to pretend that birthright citizenship isn't really birthright citizenship. That's straight out of Orwell.

Tenchusatsu



To: Bonefish who wrote (1549328)7/24/2025 1:40:55 AM
From: Wharf Rat3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
pocotrader
Tenchusatsu

  Respond to of 1582737
 
It's been used like this for about 150 years.