Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Things Weather and Mother Nature -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Green who wrote (824)	7/29/2025 1:45:30 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 923

No Don it is not just another opinion. It is an analysis of who had an opinion and what they answered and it not 97% of scientist sat CO2 from made by man if causing global global warming that is dangerous. The analysis shows the 97% is a myth by any rational statistical analysis using accepted rules. Who is John Robson? This vid tells it. You seem not to be able to see bloviating opinions vs informed opinions. It also explain why everything said by gore is obvious science nonsense. It also means you cannot tell the difference between science and nonsense at fundamental level. There is no objective data that shows any connection between current recent change CO2 PPM and changes in temperature in the satellite era. All there is are millions?? of scientist say bla bla and I guess 97% do not say who scientist was. So emotionally raping young people is not important. 60K plus excess deaths in the EU caused by cold as a result of high renewable energy costs is so what. If crop yields are 30% higher because of increased CO2, how many more human live because they have more food.