Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (1550204)	8/1/2025 7:57:14 AM
From: Land Shark	3 Recommendations Recommended By pocotrader rdkflorida2 sylvester80 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570977

We’re boycotting the USA for its support of a pedophile and blackmailing us with tariffs. TACO’s reasoning is at the level of a 5 year old.

To: Bill who wrote (1550204)	8/1/2025 8:08:54 AM
From: sylvester80	3 Recommendations Recommended By Land Shark pocotrader rdkflorida2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570977

PEDO POS trump MAY HAVE ACCIDENTALLY "admitted knowledge of a grotesque crime": legal expert Trump may have accidentally 'admitted knowledge of a grotesque crime': legal expert Story by Daniel Hampton • 12h • 3 min read A legal expert was taken aback Thursday night after watching President Donald Trump admit he knew of a "grotesque crime" when he talked about his falling out with Jeffrey Epstein. Ryan Goodman, founding co-editor-in-chief of the legal and policy website Just Security, joined Erin Burnett on CNN's "OutFront" to weigh in on Trump's shocking remarks regarding his relationship with Epstein, who died in prison while awaiting trial on sex trafficking allegations. Burnett noted the White House has offered multiple explanations about the falling out, including over a real estate deal. Trump, however, has instead said their friendship blew up because Epstein hired his spa workers — a claim that, she said, "doesn’t add up, because the hiring-away was two years before Trump was continuing to say wonderful things about Epstein—and seven years before he kicked him out of the club." "Now they’re saying, and Trump has used this word before, that Epstein was a 'creep,' and that the White House says, quote, 'Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees.' I mean, does any of this add up legally? Goodman was floored by the remarks. "So I think they’ve gotten themselves in more trouble by these references, that the reason for it was that he was a creep or that he was a creep to the — "It’s hard to say he’s a creep if you said you didn’t know what he was doing," Burnett interjected. "Exactly," replied Goodman. "So if he kicked him out because of sexual predation toward the employees, then it means he had knowledge." Goodman said Trump's timeline "doesn’t make sense." A Trump Organization attorney has said Epstein was booted from Mar-a-Lago in 2007 due to an arrest a year earlier in Florida. Now, the White House is claiming he took that action over what he knew. "A year after the arrest for pedophilia. Seven years after Virginia Giuffre is hired—is stolen—seven years after that?" asked Burnett. "Seven years after that. So it’s not a good look for them, at the least. And that’s about, in some sense, moral culpability, not legal culpability. There would have to be more for that. But it does seem as though he’s admitting to knowledge of a grotesque crime against minors. That’s the problem." When Burnett asked whether any recourse is possible for Trump over what he knew at the time, Goodman poured cold water on the idea. "If it’s just knowledge, there’s only one situation in which there would actually be legal obligations. And that’s if somebody is a mandatory reporter. But to be a mandatory reporter, they’d have to be like a schoolteacher or a medical doctor," he said. "Not a rich friend?" Burnett clarified. "No, not just a friend or anything like that. And that would also be under state law. And there would probably also be a statute of limitations problem for that particular offense. But otherwise, that would chalk up to moral culpability." Watch the clip below or at this link. Watch the video at this link. Recommended Links: Epstein victim's family appalled by Trump comments: 'It makes us ask if he was aware' 'Bad situation': Expert warns Trump in legal jeopardy with 'significant' Epstein admission 'Significant': Erin Burnett catches Trump in Epstein 'lie' with devastating clip Epstein believed Trump was the 'rat' who snitched on him to FBI: biographer Visit Raw Story 'You're not the right fit for us anymore': GOP lawmaker runs into buzzsaw at town hall 'Stubborn moron!' Fuming Trump launches dawn attack as repeated demands go ignored Trump ally sets up 'tip line' for admin insiders to rat out disloyal colleagues: report