Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bonefish who wrote (1550765)	8/5/2025 1:21:23 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Respond to of 1582531

Bonefish, No. I was just correcting your lie that it was taxpayer funded. Why do you repeating that lie? I just explained to you how that ballroom is indeed taxpayer funded. You don't address any of my points because you know I'm right. You know Trump is indeed using taxpayer funds to enrich himself so that he can pay for these ego-boosting projects. Ask yourself this. How is this ballroom going to mAkE aMeRiCa gReAt aGaIn? Will it reduce the price of eggs and ground beef? Will it open up the global market of U.S. exports to other countries? Will it convince Trump's cuck-buddy PooTin to stop his three-day war of choice? And why does this ballroom have to be constructed on a property that doesn't belong to him? The White House is a taxpayer-funded residence. If Trump wants to build a monument to himself, he can build it in one of his dozens of properties like Mar-A-Lago. Tenchusatsu