SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LoneClone who wrote (310775)8/6/2025 12:40:50 PM
From: ralfph4 Recommendations

Recommended By
flashforward2009
gg cox
LoneClone
onepath

  Respond to of 312712
 
That may be the kind of question to ask privately. You have to question someone who thinks it is ok to vote for a sexual predator, a liar, someone who has cheated on all his wives, someone who has destroyed many small business men, someone who breaks contracts he has created, someone who openly talks about sticking his hands on woman's vaginas, who openly comments on woman's breasts, a racist, most likely a Russian asset, someone who attempted to overthrow the US government, who is now a dictator and is stupid to boot.
Not worth your time, and certainly not worth cluttering up RTT with an off topic post from a brown shirt who would put a creep in power.



To: LoneClone who wrote (310775)8/7/2025 8:07:17 AM
From: WalterWhite  Respond to of 312712
 
LC - of course I am not a "true libertarian" as all dogmas, religions, typically are faulty and headed by extremists.

I am a small government person 100%. Hard no to government "investment" social engineering etc etc. Crazy that the west is dominated by large government and ego maniacs. I do not rise to great a PM/President as they work for us...well supposed to.

Socially a liberal, fiscally a hawk. Would eliminate income, corporate and other invisble taxes, replace with a single consumption tax. Transparency, smaller gov overheads, much less filing, and forces tax lawyers and accountants (smart bunch!) to find real work that actually adds value. Also would result in capital and head offices/jobs returning to Canada after decades of leaving Canuckistan (totally logical in doing so).

Governments should only need to meet once a quarter. Law makers right? How often must laws be tweaked? Budgets are trivial... but not now because we somehow have allowed them to "invest" (pukes in mouth typing that lol) and play social engineering games. Defense, infrastructure is a long term setup. We borrow money to provide charity...that is how insane the system has become. The unborn are funding causes they have no say about. Speaking of which, i would eliminate all government charity. People can give as they choose. Governmment takes such a large chunk in Canada now, charity is nearly financially impossible for many. Ther rulers want to give to their pet projects and take the credit for themselves, not allow the peasants to do their own thing. The drama we currently see is of their making, nonsensical. Narcassists need TV and X time lol.

We are far poorer than we should be given bordering the wealthiest country, natural resources, institutions etc. A Moroccan friend always asks why Canadians have to work. Interesting question.

I have lived in a few different places. Most Canadians are the proverbial frog in the pot on the stove slowly getting cooked. Cheers.