Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KM who wrote (48769)	2/24/1998 10:41:00 PM
From: Spank	Respond to of 58324

whoops! sorry truff, i shoulda said "litigious" Gary forgot to mention litigious whining but hey, this sort of post is all in fun, and though i'm no t/a sort, and am barely functional in my frontal lobes as it is (as they are? is? was?) and your losses in IOM probably dwarf my annual salary for years to come ummm.... scratchesself picksnose oh yeah... I'd still be interested in hearing who you think is responsible for the post-earnings pre-CC drop on the million-ish shares. are you still under the impression it was all KE's doing? -Spank btw, syntactic fault-finding is a weak rebuttal to substantive semantics, don't you think? btw2, i believe it's "[sic]" not "(sic)"