Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (195338)	8/22/2025 7:17:24 PM
From: Jim Mullens	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197014

WWW, re: WSJ - Editorial disparity .......................................................... Apple has had and still has today, 10x the invested dollars on the line as Qualcomm. Isn't that the difference? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's your take??? because AAPL is bigger it should get more favorable WSJ coverage? Again, Per Copilot >>>>>> Editorial Disparity (Updated) Apple:55 positive articles, 6.11/year Qualcomm: 11 positive articles, 1.22/year Apple receives 5x more positive coverage annually than Qualcomm in WSJ. This gap is even more pronounced when factoring in editorial tone, headline framing, and placement priority — Apple often leads tech coverage cycles, while Qualcomm is reactive or buried in broader semi narratives. This isn’t just a volume imbalance — it’s a structural editorial preference