SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Support the French! Viva Democracy! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (7784)9/9/2025 9:38:53 AM
From: Maple MAGA   Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7814
 
Ooh, there's no bread, let them eat cake
There's no end to what they'll take
Flaunt the fruits of noble birth
Wash the salt into the earth

But they're marching to Bastille Day
The guillotine will claim her bloody prize
Free the dungeons of the innocent
The king will kneel and let his kingdom rise

Ooh, bloodstained velvet, dirty lace
Naked fear on every face
See them bow their heads to die
As we would bow when they rode by

And we're marching to Bastille Day
The guillotine will claim her bloody prize
Sing, oh choirs of cacophony
The king has kneeled to let his kingdom rise

Lessons taught but never learned
All around us anger burns
Guide the future by the past
Long ago, the mould was cast

For they marched up to Bastille Day
The guillotine claimed her bloody prize
Hear the echoes of the centuries
Power isn't all that money buys
Oh!





To: Tom Clarke who wrote (7784)9/18/2025 11:09:11 PM
From: Maple MAGA   Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7814
 
Macrons to offer 'scientific evidence' to US court to prove Brigitte is a woman, lawyer says

22 hours ago

Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty,

Melanie Stewart-Smith and

Victoria Farncombe

Fame Under Fire podcast



Getty Images

Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, are planning to present photographic and scientific evidence to a US court to prove Mrs Macron is a woman.

Their lawyer says the French president and Mrs Macron will present the documentation in a defamation suit they have taken against the right-wing influencer Candace Owens after she promoted her belief that Brigitte Macron was born male.

Ms Owens' lawyers have responded with a motion to dismiss the claim.

Speaking to the BBC's Fame Under Fire podcast, the Macrons' lawyer in the case, Tom Clare, said Mrs Macron had found the claims "incredibly upsetting" and they were a "distraction" to the French president.

"I don't want to suggest that it somehow has thrown him off his game. But just like anybody who is juggling a career and a family life as well, when your family is under attack, it wears on you. And he's not immune from that because he's the president of a country," he said.

Mr Clare said there would be "expert testimony that will come out that will be scientific in nature" and while he would not reveal, at this stage, its exact nature, he said the couple were prepared to demonstrate fully "both generically and specifically" that the allegations are false.

"It is incredibly upsetting to think that you have to go and subject yourself, to put this type of proof forward," he said.

"It is a process that she will have to subject herself to in a very public way. But she's willing to do it. She is firmly resolved to do what it takes to set the record straight.

"If that unpleasantness and that discomfort that she has of opening herself up in that way is what it takes to set a record straight and stop this, she's 100% ready to meet that burden."



The Macrons' lawyer Tom Clare says the couple find the allegations upsetting and can demonstrate they are false

When asked if the Macrons would be supplying pictures of Brigitte pregnant and raising her children, Mr Clare said they existed and would be presented in court where there are rules and standards.

Ms Owens, a former commentator for conservative US outlet Daily Wire who has millions of followers on social media, has repeatedly promoted her view that Brigitte Macron is a man.

In March 2024, she claimed she would stake her "entire professional reputation" on the allegation.

The allegation originated in fringe online spaces years earlier, notably through a 2021 YouTube video by French bloggers Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey.

The Macrons initially won a defamation case in France against Roy and Rey in 2024, but that ruling was overturned on appeal in 2025 on freedom of expression grounds, not on the basis of truth. The Macrons are appealing the decision.

In July, the Macrons filed a lawsuit against Ms Owens in the US. It alleges she "disregarded all credible evidence disproving her claim in favour of platforming known conspiracy theorists and proven defamers".

In American defamation cases against public figures, plaintiffs are required to prove "actual malice" - that the defendant knowingly spread false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.



Candace Owens

Candace Owens has repeated her claim that Brigitte Macron is a man, on YouTube and social media

In August, Emmanuel Macron explained to French magazine, Paris Match, why they had chosen to pursue legal action.

"This is about defending my honour! Because this is nonsense. This is someone who knew full well that she had false information and did so with the aim of causing harm, in the service of an ideology and with established connections to far-right leaders."

Ms Owens' lawyers have responded to the Macrons' lawsuit with a motion to dismiss, arguing that the case should not have been filed in Delaware, as she says it does not relate to her businesses, which are incorporated in the state. They claim forcing her to defend the case in Delaware would cause "substantial financial and operational hardship".

The BBC has approached Candace Owens' legal team for a comment. She has previously said she believes what she is saying is true and there is nothing more American than free speech and the ability to criticise.



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (7784)9/22/2025 11:22:11 PM
From: Maple MAGA   Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7814
 
France’s Macron Has Been a Mediocre President. Now He Is Also an Immoral One.

Sep 22, 2025 10:00 am

By Hugh Fitzgerald

4 Comments

So if France rewards Hamas by recognizing a “state of Palestine” just now, won’t that increase the terror group’s appeal to those “Palestinian people” whom Macron claims merely “want a state”? Macron has no idea that it is not just Hamas, but almost all Palestinians, who want Israel to disappear altogether, to be replaced by a twenty-third Arab state. He does not realize that the creation of a “state of Palestine” would whet, not sate, Palestinian appetites for more of Israeli land. He does not comprehend that any “state of Palestine” would be used, just as Gaza has been used by Hamas after the Israelis pulled out in 2005, as a place from which to launch endless attacks on Israel, whatever the size at that point of the Jewish state. More on Macron’s moral and geopolitical madness can be found here: “France Set to Recognize Palestinian State Despite Majority of Citizens Opposing the Move, New Survey Shows,” by Ailin Vilches Arguello, Algemeiner, September 19, 2025:



France’s expected move has also sparked strong reactions across the country, amid an already tense and hostile climate.

That “tense and hostile climate” in France is a result of the millions of Muslim economic migrants now living in France who have made life for the indigenous French more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous than before those Muslim migrants arrived. They have been costing the state billions of dollars annually in welfare benefits of every kind — free or subsidized housing, free health care, free education and vocational training, family allowances, and more. These Muslim migrants are responsible for a steep rise in crime. Muslims in France make up 10% of the population, but more than 60% of the prison population. Muslims have established dozens of No-Go areas in France, where non-Muslims fear to tread, and even representatives of the state, such as firemen and policemen, need to enter those areas in well-guarded groups lest they be attacked by the locals.

Macron’s determination to recognize a Palestinian state with no preconditions, despite it being opposed by 71% of French voters, can be explained partly by his ignorance of what the Palestinians want, which is not, and never has been, “a Palestinian state living side by side with a Jewish one, in peace and security.” Macron does not understand the jihadist imperative, according to which the Infidel state of Israel, shaped like a dagger that has been plunged into the heart of Arabdom, has to be destroyed. Its continued existence is a constant reminder of the humiliation felt by the Arabs after the nakba — the “catastrophe” — of the 1948 war. Israel exists on land that was once possessed by Muslims and, therefore, it must forever be seen as Muslim land.

Macron is also keenly aware of the increasing Muslim vote, and is willing to spend the coin of Israel’s security to buy the political loyalty of Muslim citizens in France.

And finally, Macron can hardly be unaware that presenting himself as a champion of the Palestinians can be of great help after he leaves the presidency, should he want to work for the Arabs as an adviser, a political consultant, a columnist for Al Jazeera, or — like former Minister of Culture Jack Lang — as the very well-paid head of the Institut du Monde Arabe in Paris. Every politician in Western Europe knows that if you do the Arabs’ political bidding, they will take good care of you, both secretly, when you are in, and openly when you are out of, office.

Macron’s courting of the Arabs through his shameful recognition of a “state of Palestine” will only stiffen the resolve of those who, like the National Rally’s Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella, and Eric Zemmour of the Reconquête Party, are ardent defenders of Israel and, perhaps even more important, are determined to halt Muslim immigration into France and to deport Muslims convicted of crimes — of whom there are a great number — back to their countries of origin. Macron appears to be little interested in this rise in Muslim numbers. His attitude seems to be the same one famously expressed by King Louis XVI — “après moi le deluge.” He is not thinking coherently about the future of France. He’s been a mediocre president; now he’s shown himself to be, with his eagerness to recognize “Palestine” and to abandon Israel, an immoral one.