Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (94827)	9/11/2025 6:00:22 AM
From: jpdunwell	3 Recommendations Recommended By ItstheJourney Libbyt tntpal Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97558

I don't want to get into a back and forth over this, but I will simply say that I'm appalled at this post, and the original "Karma" post that spawned it. Do you really think what happened is "Karma", and that sentiment deserved a recommendation? Seriously disappointed in your messaging on this. I never followed Charlie Kirk that closely, but I'm not aware that he ever advocated for unprovoked violence. And yet you feel that because he advocated for gun rights, that his "actions" on this front are responsible (i.e. consequences) for his death? Sorry, but that's very weak and you're better than that. A nutjob was responsible for what took place, and that just as likely would have taken place whether Charlie Kirk advocated for gun rights or not. And even if gun control was much stricter, I'm completely unconvinced that would have prevented what happened. I wonder if people that expressed this sentiment would be able to do so in the presence of his wife, kids and family, and still not feel subhuman.