Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (94881)	9/11/2025 1:26:47 PM
From: ajtj99	1 Recommendation Recommended By S. maltophilia Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97529

I had discussions with a politician about motorcycle helmet laws about 20-years ago. Their point was that people should have the freedom to be stupid if they are the only ones at risk. My point was that when the motorcycle rider gets splattered all over the highway, it's taxpayer funded police and fire fighters who have to come to their aid. Furthermore, if they have a debilitating brain injury, the public picks up the tab for that. Having the rider wear a helmet helps shield the taxpayer from monetary liability. I'm not sure I made my point very well or defended it well. Looking at it from a drug legalization standpoint, you could make the argument that legalization creates a greater liability on the taxpayer (it actually doesn't if it is combined with treatment).