SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Julius Wong who wrote (216678)9/21/2025 9:04:00 AM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Arran Yuan
Julius Wong

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217732
 
‘Nuff-said




To: Julius Wong who wrote (216678)9/21/2025 9:22:22 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217732
 
J20 is nothing like F22 / F35, up close and personal, and literally seamless, and and and and does not rust at all, now also on stationary display for up close study because it is too backward. The all-around stealth is one and only in this galaxy. Much copium on net :0)




To: Julius Wong who wrote (216678)9/22/2025 8:19:00 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Julius Wong

  Respond to of 217732
 
Improving




To: Julius Wong who wrote (216678)9/22/2025 8:39:58 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217732
 
Interesting in an of course sort of way, 5,000 old fight jets retrofitted to be unmanned combat platforms carrying very modern munitions

Opponent must expand munitions against such, and not necessarily win. Watch n brief, as only manufacturing domain with excess capacity can play such gaming

armyrecognition.com
Alert: China's Decades-Old J-6 Fighter Jet Reborn As Supersonic Expendable Drone For Saturation Strikes.




To: Julius Wong who wrote (216678)9/25/2025 11:07:02 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217732
 
re <<GetMoreGold>>

... unclear to me why by the people for the people voted for below initiative, but am confident that the people know what they are doing, did, and that the POTUS is wisely playing 6D poker to scare the dharma's to invest in re-industrialization, that which must trigger re-electrification, re-copper-mining, copper-refining, etc etc

bloomberg.com

Trump Plans New Tariff Push With 100% Rate on Patented Drugs

By Lauren Dezenski, Madison Muller, and Jennifer A Dlouhy

September 26, 2025 at 7:36 AM GMT+8
Updated on
September 26, 2025 at 9:43 AM GMT+8

US President Donald Trump announced a fresh round of tariffs, including a 100% duty on branded or patented pharmaceuticals starting October 1, unless a company is building a manufacturing plant in America.

Read More: US to Impose Tariffs on Heavy Trucks, Kitchen Cabinets

No levies will be applied to pharmaceutical imports if companies have broken ground on a US manufacturing plant, or if such a plant is under construction, Trump posted on social media Thursday.

“Starting October 1st, 2025, we will be imposing a 100% Tariff on any branded or patented Pharmaceutical Product, unless a Company IS BUILDING their Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Plant in America,” Trump wrote. “There will, therefore, be no Tariff on these Pharmaceutical Products if construction has started.”

Trump’s announcement was one of several about new industry-focused tariffs set to begin next Wednesday. Imported heavy trucks will be subject to a 25% duty, kitchen cabinets and bathroom vanities will be hit with a 50% charge, and upholstered furniture imports are to be taxed at 30%.

Taken together, the moves amount to a rapid expansion of Trump’s tariff regime, which he started to erect shortly after taking office. It comes at a time when the president has flexed his executive powers like none of his modern predecessors; just as Trump made the levies public, former FBI Director James Comey — a longtime Trump political enemy — was indicted on perjury charges under heavy pressure from the president.

Read more: Trump’s Trade War and the Economic Impact: Tariff Tracker

Asian stocks fell on news of the tariffs, with shares in Japan, Australia and South Korea all opening lower, while S&P 500 futures pared earlier gains. Asian pharmaceutical stocks slumped.



A pharmacist pulls a drug from a shelf inside a pharmacy in Provo, Utah, US, on Thursday, Aug. 7, 2025.Photographer: George Frey/Bloomberg

“Trump is never going to be done with tariffs,” Deborah Elms, head of trade policy at Hinrich Foundation, said on Bloomberg Television. “This is an incredible breathtaking expansion of tariff coverage that will affect everyone including those countries that thought that they have a deal in place under those reciprocal tariffs that are not covered by these sector-specific new applications.”

The posts offered no further details. The pharmaceuticals plan, as described by the president, could allow for wide exemptions for companies with presences in the US. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for more specifics.

Disparate Impact

Major drugmakers, including Merck & Co., AstraZeneca PLC and Johnson & Johnson, have announced billions of dollars in planned US manufacturing investments in the months since Trump’s inauguration, following the president’s repeated threats to impose levies on drugs imported from overseas.

“The actual comment from the President is direct but its impact may be somewhere between nebulous and negligible,” Mizuho Securities health-care specialist Jared Holz said in a note. “All major players have some production presence domestically and almost all have announced increased investment directly tied towards local manufacturing.”

Still, some could be left exposed. Multinational drugmakers have said they primarily rely on plants in the US to supply the domestic market, but not all of them have broken ground on their promised expansions.

Several of America’s best-selling drugs are still largely produced abroad. The main ingredient in Novo Nordisk A/S’s diabetes and weight-loss juggernauts Ozempic and Wegovy is made in Denmark, while a critical first step in the production of Mounjaro, Eli Lilly & Co.’s rival GLP-1, happens in Ireland.

Johnson & Johnson’s immune-disease therapy Stelara and cancer drug Darzalex are manufactured in Switzerland and Denmark, respectively. Opdivo, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.’ blockbuster cancer immunotherapy, relies heavily on production in Ireland and Switzerland. Novartis AG’s Cosentyx and Entresto also originate in Swiss facilities.

Unless those companies can show they’ve broken ground on US sites that will take on production, their biggest sellers could face tariffs that would instantly double import costs. Novo Nordisk, for example, is building a new 1.4 million square foot manufacturing plant in North Carolina, while Eli Lilly earlier this year announced plans for four new US manufacturing sites.

Some Japanese pharmaceutical companies also make drugs for rare and serious conditions that might be subject to the new tariff. Hemlibra, used to help clot blood in hemophilia patients, is made by Japanese drugmaker Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, while Enhertu, used to deliver chemotherapy directly to breast cancer cells without damaging healthy ones, is made by Daiichi Sankyo Co.

Section 232

Trump is imposing product-bases levies using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which allows the administration to impose tariffs without congressional action if imports are deemed a national security threat. The approach has already been used to impose levies on automobile, copper, steel and aluminum imports.

Other duties on critical imports, including semiconductors and critical minerals, are expected in the coming weeks. His administration has also launched investigations into imports of robotics, industrial machinery and medical devices that could have wide-ranging effects for domestic manufacturers.

In April, the Commerce Department began investigating the impact of all drug imports — both finished generic and branded medicines as well as the ingredients used to make them — on US national security.

Trump has previewed his move on pharmaceutical tariffs for months, albeit in haphazard fashion. In early July, Trump said he intended to give drug companies some leeway to bring their operations to the US before slapping tariffs of as much as 200% on their products. Then, on July 15, the president said he was likelyto begin imposing tariffs on pharmaceuticals by the end of the month.

If the new tariffs don’t stack on top of existing country deals, their impact will be limited as several major foreign production economies have reached trade deals with the White House. For example, in late July, the US and EU reached a broad trade agreement that includes 15% tariffs on pharmaceutical products.

Pharma Threats

The industry-based tariffs offer potentially more durability than the country-level levies Trump imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The Supreme Court has agreed to consider a challenge to those tariffs, after two lower courts have already declared them illegal.

Trump has also targeted the drug industry in other ways. The tariff announcement follows an executive order that attempts to reduce prices by aligning American drug costs with the lowest prices paid abroad. The order, which Trump signed May 12, asks companies to cut prices voluntarily or face regulatory measures, though it’s unclear how exactly that will be enacted.

The president announced his tariff plan days ahead of a White House-imposed deadline for 17 of the biggest drug manufacturers to voluntarily reduce what they charge the US government for approved medicines and set the price of new drugs on par with what they cost overseas. In a July letter to company CEOs, Trump threatened to “deploy every tool in our arsenal” to punish companies that don’t comply by Monday.

“This refreshed threat on pharma has been brought up by Trump several times as a negotiation tool,” said Anna Wu, cross-asset strategist at VanEck Associates Corp. in Sydney.

— With assistance from Catherine Lucey, Carmeli Argana, Anand Krishnamoorthy, Damian Garde, Jason Gale, Abhishek Vishnoi, and Kanoko Matsuyama