Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : GTIS - Will it be a Phoenix or not ? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Miller who wrote (1564)	2/25/1998 1:29:00 PM
From: Nutty Buddy	Respond to of 2319

Scott, you just wasted one of your valuable posts by just repeating yourself. One more left for the day. Have you tried the Yahoo chat. It's free! And much more full of misinformation. As far as misinformation goes, GT is probably the master. Reporting profits every quarter while losing money. If their accounting methods are sound, it sure leaves stockholders in the dark. Now they want to make amends. After all this, how can you trust management? The issue on this board has been distrust in management. Tell me something Scott, why should I trust GT now. Sure, GT may be turning around, but until new management comes in, I, along with many here will be skeptical. So when you pop in here with a cavalier attitude, your just getting the skeptical backlash that is due GT. We are not looking for a savior. Those folks on Yahoo may be easier to convince. Buddy

To: Scott Miller who wrote (1564)	2/25/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: Robert Floyd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2319

Scott, You speak of yourself like we should be very grateful for your consideration. Yet, you answer only a few of our questions, many of those only so that you can interject snide remarks. What value have you added to this thread during this brief window of opportunity (aka: free time). If you have value to add, please start doing so.

To: Scott Miller who wrote (1564)	2/26/1998 4:56:00 AM
From: RJC2006	Respond to of 2319

<<Here's one of those famous examples of "rampant misinformation" that has made me cringe so often in the past. Our agreement with Threshold gives us near total creative control and veto power on all the critical areas we cared about, such as the Duke actor, movie "treatment" and the script. Plus, Larry Kasonoff, CEO of Threshold, knows that we here at Apogee know the Duke character better than anyone, and he demands our participation and input, which he smartly knows will make the movie all the better.>> HAHA...man...yeah ol' Larry's just gotta have your input Scott. After all, there is no way in hell a man of his limited experience is going to be able to understand Duke simply by playing the game! No siree, Duke has depth and he is far too complex for anyone of Mr. Kasonoff's stature to comprehend. By the way Scott, maybe you should write the script. After all it's apparent no one has a way with fiction the way you do! Well shoot Scott, I tell ya what. Why don't ya invite ol' Lars to take part in our little social here. After all a man of your influence should have no trouble at all convincing him to come pay us a visit! I mean after all, everyone knows that all of the Hollywood elite are going to be breaking down doors to get the lead in this epic and he might be interested in what we have to say about it. Why hell, you might even consider paying his membership fee out of principle! Oh which reminds me Scott. Please do explain to our readers when we could possibly see a Duke Penthouse II level? After all the last one was obviously a smashing success! LMAO! <<You can "maintain" whatever you want, but everyone here should realize you're clueless, have no real information regarding this, and you're simply making poorly educated guesses that could be negatively affecting investor's decisions.>> Man Scotty, I am grateful I wasn't drinking milk when I read this! "Poorly educated guesses" which means that today's word is O-X-Y-M-O-R-O-N. Just leave out the O, the X and the Y in your case Scott old boy. Now those investors that have been affected by my "poorly educated guesses" please accept my apology. I just know how much influence I and Mr. Miller must cast towards your investment decisions. <<After I'm gone you will likely have no opposition to your clueless theories, and perhaps people here will think you know what you're talking about. In the world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.>> Oh really? The only "theory" I have proposed is that you are a shill looking for a free ride on this board. As it stands it doesn't seem to make any difference whether you are here or not. Seems to me that there already is no opposition to the idea that you are not only a fake but a poor one at that. Now hang around and I may explain to you why hot air always rises temporarily. >>> Okay Game Boy, I want the credit for being the first to suggest that you sir are a fake. And I'll take credit for suggesting that you sir are a clueless bozo. Scott Miller Apogee>> Yawwwn. Hey, Scotty...is that anyway to talk to one of your best customers! GUFFAW. So please assure GT holders that you won't be writing those fabulously snappy quips that are a staple of Duke Nukem. As I have said Scott. You guys got it all wrong. Change your name from Gang Of Developers to Developers Of Games...it's much more humble and a lot more truthful. Why if you keep this up I just may pay for your membership myself just to watch you gnaw your leg out of the bear trap you've set for yourself! Keep up the good work "Scott".