Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jimmy who wrote (7614)	2/25/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: T.K. Allen	Respond to of 10368

Jimmy: I fear you are right. I was thinking that lawyers always seem to have another avenue to pursue. However, I remember commenting back when AG Condon was trying to piggyback the "illegal lottery" concept onto this federal suit that his approach didn't make much sense because his contention was founded on wording in the South Carolina Constitution. I was amazed that a federal judge would agree to even consider a state issue. Judge Anderson did essentially what I thought he would do in the first place, that is, hand it back to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide. Therefore, what other avenue of appeal is there for the losing side? The U.S. Supreme Court? I don't think they would be interested. TKA