Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (216841)	9/27/2025 1:20:45 AM
From: nicewatch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218074

OK, sorry but I cannot seriously engage with some of these comments since half of them are laughable if not, "DUH!". :-) One part overlooked or read too fast and was confused because I did look up the watch and had already seen a press photo of it before you ever mentioned it, that prior green dial watch is part of the 24 line. But given its dimensions plus that bracelet, that's very much a unisex size for many years into the future, imo. Most ladies prefer bigger watches now, and many collectors (mostly men) are rediscovering the value and quality in neo-vintage higher quality pieces from the 1980s and early 1990s, before many watch cases started mushrooming in diameter. One of the finest watches I own is from the end of that era, an AP Quantieme perpetual with platinum case, hand guilloche platinum dial, and platinum hands... with a mostly rose gold movement/plates and bridges with a touch of yellow gold on the automatic rotor. Like your PP 3970 it's sort of an ultimate tuxedo watch just much thinner! Case diameter is similar but yours has more heft and would wear bigger. fwiw. :-)