SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cary Chubin who wrote (15030)2/25/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: Anthony Lore  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25960
 
Cary,
I believe that by new types of lithography they are referring to thing like soft x-ray, etc. At least I hope so!!

--Anthony



To: Cary Chubin who wrote (15030)2/25/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: Andrew Vance  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 25960
 
Heavens No Sir!!!

What this means is that a new TYPE of lithography will not be needed.
Let me provide a brief rundown.

Flashlight Lithography - broadband UV light used to image features. this included the g,h,i line wavelengths of light (436,405,365nm wavelengths of light) used in contact printers and projection aligners. This was used from greater than 10u feature sizes down to, let's just say 2.0u feature sizes. Arguments can be made for the lower limit but let's just use that number for illustrative purposes. This technology took us from the early contact printers where the mask and the wafer were either in contact or close proximity to each other up through the projection aligners that stuck a great deal of optics between the mask and the wafer.

UV Lithography - tighter band UV light used or pass band filters used to image device features. Some of this appeared on the projection aligners but mostly were introduced with the wafer steppers. This techology used gh, g, and i-line wavelengths of light (436/406, 436, 365nm) to accomplish the task and utilized reticles instead of masks. Masks had repititive images on them since the entire mask image was scanned across the wafer. Steppers had discrete fields of limited images that were stepped across the wafer. This technology was implemented at 2.0u(1.0u to 2.0u) and was successfully used down to 0.35u feature sizes. Again a debate can be made for 0.25u but it is irrelevant to the discussion.

If you look at the number of process technologies that were implemented with the above two UV lithography suites of tools you will see that this is a 30-40 year life cycle. Through this entire life cycle it was determined many times that the limits of optical lithography were at 2.0u, then 1.0u, then sub micron and beyond. All this was based on the the levels of understanding optics, Physics, numerical apertures, etal. at that prevailing time. Many advances and improvements were made to extend the life of this type of lithography over the years. Even today the debate rages on whether UV runs out at 0.35u or 0.25u knowing full well the debates raged a few years ago about 0.35u vs. 0.50u technology. Anyway, over these same years the following technologies were going to replace optical lithography when it ran out of gas: e-beam, DUV, laser/iom beam, x-ray (I think I got them all). Everyone of these got delayed and pushed out as optical lithography broke the rules and was extended.

This brings us to the present DUV Lithography. Many discussions and debates have occurred over the last few years as to when DUV would run out of gas. no one really believed it could enjoy a life cycle like the above two technologies. It was thought to be an interim lithographic process of limited life before you were forced to use e-beam or x-ray which both have major production hurdles to overcome. As it turns out, the existing 193nm laser has been used to get features down to 0.08u which translates to about 5 device possible technologies (0.25u 0.18u, 0.13/.015u, 0.11/0.10u, and 0.08u) without even needing a new wavelength laser. Of course we know that CYMI is working on some advanced lasers. we can conclude that given the advances in DUV laser technology, 0.08u will be a given once it is needed for production. this recent breakthrough might even expedite the move to sub 0.10u device features.

With all this said, the statement you refer to is not gloom and doom. To me it means that the existing designed equipment set, with upgrades and improvements, can be extended a few more generations. This does not mean that there will not be a need to buy new or more pieces of equipment down the road. This just means e-beam and x-ray lithography and tools may not be needed as soon a previously expected. This is good news since R&D dollars will not have to be expended to develop a NEW lithographic technology toolset. You will need to buy more of the existing equipment as the older technologies disappear and create a need for the DUV toolset.

Andrew



To: Cary Chubin who wrote (15030)2/25/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: George Coyne  Respond to of 25960
 
<< This seems to imply the need for many types of upgrades may no longer exist. Help! >>

Cary, My take is that the statement is incorrect. There will be a tidal wave of competition to produce ever more compact and powerful chips and it will be coming soon.

G. W.