Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (216877)	9/29/2025 11:47:46 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 220056

following up Message 35277974 re <<seem less likely to win>> link #3 scmp.com China’s DeepSeek unveils experimental version of its V3 AI model before National Day holiday link #4 scmp.com Alibaba’s Qwen3-Omni tops Hugging Face AI ranking as Chinese open systems flourish link #5 scmp.com China is ‘nanoseconds behind’ US in chips, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says link #10 bloomberg.com DeepSeek Debuts ‘Sparse Attention’ Method in Next-Gen AI Model link #30 link #32 link #33

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (216877)	9/30/2025 3:22:05 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220056

I have great hopes for the Team Trump w/r to this meeting absolutely necessary positively appropriate go go go msnbc doing sour-grapes but, sure, keeping open-mind, meaning agnostic, in case am proven wrong

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (216877)	10/4/2025 10:04:54 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220056

Q: Curiosity, please compare and contrast WWII and now battles in the Ukraine direction, including names Kharkov, Kiev, Dnieper River, Kursk. Tia, J

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (216877)	10/14/2025 12:12:07 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220056

re <<It seems that the combination of Confucian civilisation and English whatnot as in Singapore and Hong Kong gives a really good result.>> dunno, perhaps, and time shall better tell, that there is a logic-gap in your take, that Confucian civilisation is inherently, in and of itself, meritocratic / better for people, and VV not at all necessary itmt I remain agnostic and wait to better see following up to Message 35295253 and Message 35295259 Q: Read your report several times, Manus, and am left with a feeling that the outdated Virtuous Victorian protocol is dehumanisingly-extractive, whereas the Confucius-enhanced way is civilisationally-transformative. What am I missing ?