Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: charred who wrote (5740)	2/25/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 10836

Lets assume that KRY unequivocally wins, with no recourse by PDG!! Would PDG have any right of recoup for the purported $US100mm they have spent already, throught Ven or International Courts? If so this is a "lien" against LC isn't it? Which would likely encumber future value until settled! the Chief

To: charred who wrote (5740)	2/25/1998 3:45:00 PM
From: flightlessbird	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

Dear Charred and Viper: In the most neutral terms I can possibly arrange, please let me ask this question one more time in a way that will not encourage you from commenting with any bias or opinion. The following is a basic trading question that any true trader would acknowledge, just as any marathon runner would tell you what brand of sneaker they use. Ready? You've avoided this question THREE times now. Let's see if the fourth is a charm: At what price would KRY have to rise to from here for you to cover and take a loss? A basic decision made by any legitimate trader. You have already acknowledged where you would cover for a profit ($2) if that should occur. Why can you not answer this other question as any REAL trader would already have in his/her mind? Thank you.