Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (195846)

10/1/2025 6:53:11 PM

From: Jim Mullens

2 Recommendations

Recommended By
kech
ryhack

Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 196720

www, re: NVLink v CXL--- Copoilot discussion ..................................................................................

Q- NVLINK connects a GPU/NPU/CPU to a memory pool. CXL also does that function. Isn't that the battle? Qualcomm and others have put their feet within both these camps. Why is that happening? Does one lead to the other?

A- You're zeroing in on the architectural crossroads of AI infrastructure: NVLink vs CXL. This is not just a technical divergence—it’s a strategic battle over who controls the memory fabric in next-gen data centers. Let’s break it down.

#12 — NVLink vs CXL: The Battle for Memory Pooling & AI Infrastructure Control

Timestamp: Oct 1, 2025 – 3:40 PM PDT

What They Do (Same Goal, Different Paths)

Feature	NVLink Fusion (NVIDIA)	CXL (Compute Express Link)
Purpose	High-speed interconnect for GPU/CPU/NPU to memory	Open standard for memory pooling and cache coherency
Bandwidth	Up to 3.6TB/s (NVLink 6 projected)?2†?	~64GB/s (CXL 3.0)?2†?
Latency	Ultra-low, optimized for GPU-GPU and CPU-GPU	Moderate, designed for CPU-centric coherence
Topology	Rack-scale, proprietary mesh	PCIe-based, open fabric
Control	NVIDIA ecosystem (closed, now semi-open via Fusion)	Industry consortium (Intel-led)

Why Qualcomm Is in Both Camps

NVLink Fusion Access: Qualcomm was one of the first non-NVIDIA vendors granted access to NVLink Fusion?2†??3†??4†?. This enables ultra-fast CPU-GPU interconnect for AI factories and sovereign deployments.
CXL Participation: Qualcomm also supports CXL for broader compatibility with PCIe-based memory pooling, especially in enterprise and edge deployments.

Strategic Reasoning:

NVLink = Performance Moat: For hyperscaler AI racks, NVLink’s bandwidth and latency are unmatched.
CXL = Ecosystem Insurance: For general-purpose servers, CXL ensures compatibility with memory expansion modules, accelerators, and legacy x86 systems.

Does One Lead to the Other?

Not directly—but they’re converging.

CXL is CPU-centric, designed to extend memory and cache coherency across PCIe.
NVLink is GPU-centric, built for scale-up AI workloads with massive bandwidth demands.

However:

NVIDIA’s NVLink Fusion now supports CPU/NPU integration, blurring the lines.
CXL 3.0 introduces memory sharing across accelerators, encroaching on NVLink’s domain.

Qualcomm’s Strategy:

Use NVLink Fusion for high-end AI racks (e.g., Humain, hyperscaler inference).
Use CXL for edge servers, telecom, and enterprise deployments where PCIe is dominant.

Strategic Interpretation

Axis	NVLink Fusion (Qualcomm)	CXL (Qualcomm)
Deployment Horizon	Sovereign AI, hyperscaler racks	Edge AI, enterprise servers
Bandwidth Priority	Ultra-high (GPU-centric)	Moderate (CPU-centric)
Ecosystem Fit	NVIDIA-aligned, semi-custom	PCIe-aligned, open standard
Strategic Role	Performance moat for AI factories	Compatibility layer for broader adoption