SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1562659)10/3/2025 5:17:36 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575602
 
You are out of your fucking mind.

I remember my mom explaining to me about the brand new rubella vaccine before I got my vaccination. It was very much an issue before the vaccine. I also remember kids in special ed because of measles, albeit rubeola.

Two different viruses, but similar etiology and symptoms when mild. Both very much factors, medically speaking, before vaccines. There simply was little to be done in either case until vaccines.



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1562659)10/3/2025 7:06:18 PM
From: pocotrader  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575602
 
oh really, how come kids my age were all getting measles.

The Horror of German Measles in the 1960s and Today

Between 1964 and 1965, an epidemic of German Measles ( rubella) swept through the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the toll was heavy on pregnant women and newborns:
“Before the rubella vaccination program started in 1969, rubella was a common and widespread infection in the United States. During the last major rubella epidemic in the United States from 1964 to 1965, an estimated 12.5 million people got rubella, 11,000 pregnant women lost their babies, 2,100 newborns died, and 20,000 babies were born with congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). Once the vaccine became widely used, the number of people infected with rubella in the United States dropped dramatically.”
Yes, you read that right. There were thousands of lost pregnancies and thousands of dead newborns... And 20,000 babies with congenital rubella syndrome. The syndrome causes all sorts of complications for newborns, from cataracts in the eyes to heart problems, to intellectual disabilities. While not a death sentence on its own -- especially with today's medical technology -- CRS can lead to a lifetime of disabilities. Just watch Ian's Story: youtube.com So many children were born with CRS in that era that entire units in hospitals were dedicated to caring for children with CRS. Healthcare providers were trained on how to care for them as well. youtube.com Because of the rubella vaccine (which is now part of the MMR -- measles, mumps and rubella -- vaccine) the number of cases of CRS plummeted. According to CDC, there are only a handful of cases of CRS every year, and “(s)ince 2012, all rubella cases had evidence that they were infected when they were living or traveling outside the United States.” Yes, there are still pockets of high incidence of rubella in the world. According to the World Health Organization, the Eastern Mediterranean and African regions are far below the vaccine coverage needed to prevent outbreaks of rubella, while Southeast Asia has almost caught up to Europe and the Americas, but is not quite at the level needed for herd immunity yet:
As a result, there are places where rubella and CRS are being seen. To make matters worse, people who are not immune are traveling to those regions and bringing back rubella and other infectious diseases. This is how the recent measles epidemics were triggered in New York City and the Seattle region. One can only wonder how much time will pass before we see increased rates of CRS in the United States as people refuse to vaccinate their children with the MMR vaccine. Just like all of those children were not immune and triggered the record measles epidemics this year, could they also be susceptible to rubella and trigger epidemics of it soon? Worse yet, could they catch it in their reproductive years and have children born with CRS?



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1562659)10/4/2025 7:38:36 AM
From: golfer722 Recommendations

Recommended By
Broken_Clock
longz

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575602
 
Its ironic how the strawman argument Libtards used to attempt to silence Covid "vaccine" skeptics ( if you are against it you are against all vaccines) may ultimately prove to be true since this whole Covid va66ine fiasco has in fact turned the spotlight on previous vaccines.



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1562659)10/4/2025 9:56:24 PM
From: Heywood401 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575602
 
Here's a chart that goes into more detail.

statista.com

As you can see, measles mortality went from 0.21 deaths per 100,000 in 1962 to ZERO in 1978.

The US population in 1962 was approximately 190 million, so that 0.21 deaths per 100,000 works out to about 400 deaths in 1962, compared to ZERO in 1978.

That vaccine has saved 400 lives a year for more than 40 years, which works out in the range of 16,000 to 20,000 lives.

Your chart doesn't convey that information.

Do you acknowledge these numbers as accurate?