SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Young and Older Folk Portfolio -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jritz0 who wrote (21126)10/9/2025 10:18:38 AM
From: 389190  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21937
 
jritz0 , perhaps I am not understanding these downside protection ETF's. So I will ask this question, why not just leave money in cash, Fidelity FDRXX for example , it currently pay 3.84%. If BALT has downside protection of 20% and an upside cap of approximately 2%, isn't cash a better option. Thank You in advance , John



To: jritz0 who wrote (21126)10/9/2025 10:34:19 AM
From: Smart_Asset  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21937
 
A quick search on buffered ETFs includes the information that. <<
  • Losses beyond the buffer: If the market declines beyond the buffer, you are exposed to losses. The buffer does not provide complete protection.>>

It seems to me that a major market correction might eliminate some or all of that downside protection..yes?



To: jritz0 who wrote (21126)10/9/2025 10:38:34 AM
From: cemanuel2 Recommendations

Recommended By
cajman1
chowder

  Respond to of 21937
 
I'm somewhat derisking but right now it's more destocking. I had a certain figure I wanted to get to and as my brokerage value went above that I wanted to have that excess in something other than stocks which, despite occasionally buying a fund or two, was almost my entire focus for the past 8+ years.

Some is certainly for downside protection and at the moment I'm using SGOV for that. But also gold, silver, and once crypto calms down a little I expect I'll get some IBIT.

I look at it almost as if I have a fixed-amount principle of my target amount. That principle will give gains and as they come I'll put those gains into these other investments.

Doesn't mean I'll never move from them into growth, and once the balance in the "non-stocks" reaches a certain point I'll quit adding to it and go back to my prior investing pattern. But this is what I'm doing for the time being.