Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1564247)	10/9/2025 9:37:22 PM
From: Maple MAGA	5 Recommendations Recommended By Broken_Clock locogringo longz maceng2 Stock Puppy Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580846

You’re confusing disagreement with ignorance. I understand perfectly well how vaccines function, they stimulate the natural immune system through controlled exposure to antigens, building adaptive memory without full infection. That’s Immunology 101. What I reject is the lazy assumption that “anti-vax” automatically means “anti-science.” There’s a wide gap between acknowledging the mechanism of vaccination and questioning the way governments, pharma, and public health bureaucracies have handled transparency, mandates, and risk-benefit communication. And no, I didn’t “copy-paste” anything. Hybrid immunity is a standard term in immunology, it’s been used in peer-reviewed literature long before ChatGPT existed. It describes the combined protection from both vaccination and prior infection, not some meme you think you invented. So maybe instead of accusing others of parroting, take a moment to listen. You might find that not everyone who disagrees with you is operating off headlines, some of us actually read the studies and the fine print.