Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : World Outlook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (48210)	10/10/2025 9:48:09 AM
From: Les H	Respond to of 48825

As WSJ stated, very unlikely resulting in prosecution unlike Trump's overstating his financial status on his business loans. These are more or less nuisance indictments or trials. Google AI: While court cases for owner-occupancy mortgage fraud are technically possible, they are rarely pursued and even more rarely dismissed. The vast majority of these issues are resolved outside of criminal court through financial remedies, or the cases are dropped by prosecutors. Why criminal prosecution is rare Most misrepresentations of owner occupancy status do not result in criminal charges. This is because: Focus on financial penalties: Federal regulators and lenders, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are primarily concerned with the financial implications. The most common outcomes are demands for the borrower to buy back the loan or pay a penalty. Preference for quiet resolution: Regulators tend to resolve these issues quietly to maintain the efficiency of the mortgage lending industry. They are not interested in clogging the court system with individual cases of misrepresentation. Prosecutorial discretion: For a criminal case to proceed, a prosecutor must decide it is worth pursuing. Occupancy fraud is often viewed as a low priority, especially in cases where the loan is still being paid. Why dismissal is unlikely if charged If a case for mortgage fraud is pursued and not dropped by the prosecutor, dismissal is rare. Statistics on federal criminal cases show that a very small percentage of cases result in dismissal or acquittal. For example, a 2023 Pew Research Center analysis found that in 2022, only 8.2% of federal criminal cases were dismissed, and less than 1% of defendants who went to trial were acquitted. Legal defenses for mortgage fraud If a borrower is charged, a lawyer may seek a dismissal or a favorable outcome by challenging the prosecution's evidence. Common defenses focus on the defendant's intent. Lack of intent: This is a primary defense. A lawyer can argue that the misstatement was a mistake or error rather than an intentional act of deception. The prosecution must prove that the defendant knowingly made a false statement to defraud the lender. Change of circumstances: The defense can show that a person's original intent was to live in the property, but a life event like a job change or family issue required them to move sooner than anticipated. First-time offenders: While not an automatic path to dismissal, a defendant's clean criminal record may be a factor in plea negotiations, potentially leading to a reduced charge or a non-custodial sentence. When criminal charges are more likely Criminal charges for owner-occupancy fraud become more probable in specific situations: Pattern of fraud: The FBI is more likely to investigate if a person has committed occupancy fraud multiple times, suggesting a broader scheme. High-loss cases: Cases involving a large financial loss to the lender or federal government are more likely to be prosecuted. Widespread fraud: A prosecutor may be more interested in pursuing a case that is part of a larger, organized mortgage fraud scheme involving multiple parties.