| Banyan Announces Updated Pit-Constrained Mineral Resource Estimate for Hyland Gold Project, Yukon, Canada 
 accessnewswire.com
 
 VANCOUVER, BC /  ACCESS Newswire / October 27, 2025 / Banyan Gold Corp. (the "Company" or "Banyan") (TSX-V:BYN)(OTCQB:BYAGF) is pleased to announce an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (the "MRE" or the "Mineral Resource") prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, Standards for Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") for the Hyland Project ("Hyland" or the "Project"),   Yukon, Canada, an additional property to Banyan's flagship Aurmac   Property as defined below in "about Banyan". ?The updated MRE   incorporates all drilling completed through 2018 and reflects the most   current information available, as no further drilling has been completed   since then.
 
 The updated MRE comprises an Indicated Mineral Resource of 337 thousand ("k") ?ounces ("oz") of gold ("Au") and 2.63 million ("M") oz of silver ("Ag") (11.3 M tonnes of ore at 0.93 g/t Au and 7.27 g/t Ag), and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 118k oz of Au and 0.86M oz Ag (3.9 M tonnes of ore at 0.95 g/t Au and 6.94 g/t Ag)(as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM")   Definition ?Standards for Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves   incorporated by reference into NI 43-101). The updated MRE is summarized   below in Table 1; cut-off grade sensitivities for the Hyland deposit are presented in Table 2. The   Hyland Project pit-constrained MRE is contained in a single   near/on-surface deposit. The deposit is accessible by float plane and by   ground via a winter road from Watson Lake with substantial drill and   heavy equipment on site (Figure 1).
 
 "The updated, pit-constrained   Mineral Resource demonstrates the potential of the Hyland Project as a   gold and silver project. Mineralization is still open along strike to   the north and south as well as at depth. With additional work, there is   potential to delineate additional mineral resources in the main zone,  as  well as define new resources in other portions of the property,"  stated  Tara Christie, President and CEO. "Work will continue in the  off-season  to update the geologic model and refine targeting at the  highly  prospective Cuz and Montrose zones."
 
 
  Figure 1. Plan Map Showing the location of the Hyland Project, Yukon, Canada. 
 
 
 
 
 
 Table 1: Pit-Constrained Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources - Hyland Project
 
 
 Hyland Gold Project Main Zone Mineral Resource Estimate Notes:| Cut-off Grade (AuEq g/t) 
 
 | Tonnes 
 
 | Au 
 
 | Ag 
 
 | AuEq 
 
 |  | Grade (g/t) 
 
 | Ozs 
 
 | Grade (g/t) 
 
 | Ozs 
 
 | Grade (g/t) 
 
 | Ozs 
 
 |  | Indicated 
 
 |  | 0.5 
 
 | 11,272,000 
 
 | 0.93 
 
 | 337,000 
 
 | 7.27 
 
 | 2,634,000 
 
 | 1.02 
 
 | 368,000 
 
 |  | Inferred 
 
 |  | 0.5 
 
 | 3,865,000 
 
 | 0.95 
 
 | 118,000 
 
 | 6.94 
 
 | 863,000 
 
 | 1.03 
 
 | 128,000 
 
 | 
 
 
 A NI  43-101 Technical Report  supporting the updated Mineral Resource has  been filed on SEDAR+ at  www.sedarplus.ca on the same day as this  release.? The pit outlines used  to constrain the MRE are shown in  Figure 2.The effective date of the Hyland Mineral Resource Estimate is September 1, 2025.
 
The   mineral resource was estimated by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P.Geo. of SGS   Geological Services who is an independent Qualified Person as defined  by  NI 43-101.
 
The  classification of the current  Mineral Resource Estimate into Indicated  and Inferred mineral resources  is consistent with current 2014 CIM  Definition Standards - For Mineral  Resources and Mineral Reserves.
 
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimateand numbers may not add due to rounding.
 
The   mineral resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by a   continuous 3D wireframe model, and is considered to have reasonable   prospects for eventual economic extraction.
 
Mineral   resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated   economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of   confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must   not be converted to a Mineral Reserve.
 
The  Hyland  mineral resource estimate is based on a validated database  which  includes data from surface trenching, and surface diamond and RC   drilling completed between 1987 and 2018.
 
The MRE for Hyland is based on one three-dimensional ("3D") resource model representing the deposit.
 
Grades   for Au and Ag were estimated for each mineralization domain using 1.5   metre drill core and 2.0 metre channel composites assigned to that   domain. To generate grade within the blocks, the inverse distance cubed   (ID2) interpolation method was used. An average SG value of 3.04 was  used for tonnage calculation.
 
Based   on the location, surface exposure, size, shape, general true  thickness,  and orientation, it is envisioned that Hyland may be mined  using  open-pit mining methods. In-pit mineral resources are reported at  a base  case cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t AuEq. The in-pit resource grade  blocks  are quantified above the base case cut-off grade, above the  constraining  pit shell, below topography and within the constraining  mineralized  domain (the constraining volume).
 
The  pit  optimization and base-case cut-off grade consider a gold price of   $2,400/oz and a silver price of $28 /oz and considers a gold recovery  of  92% and silver recovery of 70%. The pit optimization and base case   cut-off grade also considers a mining cost of US$2.40/t mined, pit slope   of 55° degrees, and processing, treatment, refining, G&A and   transportation cost of USD$19.50/t of mineralized material.
 
The   results from the pit optimization, using the pseudoflow optimization   method in Whittle 2022, are used solely for the purpose of testing the   "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" by an open pit and do not   represent an attempt to estimate mineral reserves. There are no  mineral  reserves on the Project. The results are used simply as a guide  to  assist in the preparation of a mineral resource statement and to  select  an appropriate resource reporting cut-off grade. A Whittle pit  shell at a  revenue factor of 1.00 was selected as the ultimate pit  shell for the  purposes of the current MRE.
 
The  estimate of  Mineral Resources may be materially affected by  environmental,  permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,  marketing, or other  relevant issues.
 
 
 Hyland Deposit
 
 The   drill data for Hyland is comprised of 86 drill holes (18,505.40 m) and   39 trenches (7,598.7 m). Completion of the current MRE also included  an  updated three-dimensional (3D) mineral resource model (resource  domain;  Figure 2).
 
 
  Figure   2: Plan View distribution of surface drill holes and channels/trenches   at the Main Zone of Hyland in relation to the mineralized model shape   (pink). Mineralization is open along strike both North and South and at   depth. 
 
 
 
 
 
 Mineralization  at  Hyland occurs in a slightly recumbent anticline developed along a   regional structural corridor known as the Quartz Lake Lineament which is   cut by southeast-trending faults. Gold and silver occur in quartz  veins  and breccias in quartzite, silicified zones in phyllite, and iron   sulphide and/or iron carbonate replacements zones in limestone.
 
 Table 2. Pit-Constrained Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources at Various AuEq g/t Cut-off Grades - Hyland Deposit
 
 
 Notes to Table 2:| Cut-off Grade (AuEq g/t) 
 
 | Tonnes 
 
 | Au 
 
 | Ag 
 
 | AuEq 
 
 |  | Grade (g/t) 
 
 | Ozs 
 
 | Grade (g/t) 
 
 | Ozs 
 
 | Grade (g/t) 
 
 | Ozs 
 
 |  | Indicated 
 
 |  | 0.2 
 
 | 16,840,000 
 
 | 0.73 
 
 | 395,000 
 
 | 5.89 
 
 | 3,188,000 
 
 | 0.80 
 
 | 432,000 
 
 |  | 0.3 
 
 | 15,397,000 
 
 | 0.78 
 
 | 385,000 
 
 | 6.22 
 
 | 3,081,000 
 
 | 0.85 
 
 | 420,000 
 
 |  | 0.4 
 
 | 13,321,000 
 
 | 0.85 
 
 | 364,000 
 
 | 6.74 
 
 | 2,885,000 
 
 | 0.93 
 
 | 397,000 
 
 |  | 0.5 
 
 | 11,272,000 
 
 | 0.93 
 
 | 337,000 
 
 | 7.27 
 
 | 2,634,000 
 
 | 1.02 
 
 | 368,000 
 
 |  | 0.6 
 
 | 9,234,000 
 
 | 1.03 
 
 | 305,000 
 
 | 7.92 
 
 | 2,352,000 
 
 | 1.12 
 
 | 333,000 
 
 |  | 0.7 
 
 | 7,411,000 
 
 | 1.13 
 
 | 270,000 
 
 | 8.69 
 
 | 2,072,000 
 
 | 1.24 
 
 | 294,000 
 
 |  | 1.0 
 
 | 4,254,000 
 
 | 1.41 
 
 | 192,000 
 
 | 10.88 
 
 | 1,488,000 
 
 | 1.53 
 
 | 210,000 
 
 |  | Inferred 
 
 |  | 0.2 
 
 | 4,866,000 
 
 | 0.82 
 
 | 128,000 
 
 | 6.29 
 
 | 985,000 
 
 | 0.89 
 
 | 139,000 
 
 |  | 0.3 
 
 | 4,488,000 
 
 | 0.87 
 
 | 125,000 
 
 | 6.55 
 
 | 944,000 
 
 | 0.94 
 
 | 136,000 
 
 |  | 0.4 
 
 | 4,166,000 
 
 | 0.91 
 
 | 122,000 
 
 | 6.72 
 
 | 900,000 
 
 | 0.99 
 
 | 133,000 
 
 |  | 0.5 
 
 | 3,865,000 
 
 | 0.95 
 
 | 118,000 
 
 | 6.94 
 
 | 863,000 
 
 | 1.03 
 
 | 128,000 
 
 |  | 0.6 
 
 | 3,159,000 
 
 | 1.05 
 
 | 107,000 
 
 | 7.73 
 
 | 786,000 
 
 | 1.14 
 
 | 116,000 
 
 |  | 0.7 
 
 | 2,594,000 
 
 | 1.15 
 
 | 96,000 
 
 | 8.57 
 
 | 715,000 
 
 | 1.25 
 
 | 104,000 
 
 |  | 1.0 
 
 | 1,565,000 
 
 | 1.39 
 
 | 70,000 
 
 | 11.00 
 
 | 554,000 
 
 | 1.52 
 
 | 77,000 
 
 | 
 
 
 Average  width  of the drill core sample intervals is 1.51m; the average width of  the  channel assay samples is 3.10m. A composite length of 1.50m and  2.00  metres was chosen for the drill core assay data and channel sample  data,  respectively.The effective date of the Hyland Mineral Resource Estimate is September 1, 2025.
 
The   mineral resource was estimated by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P.Geo. of SGS   Geological Services and is an independent Qualified Person as defined  by  NI 43-101.
 
The  classification of the current  Mineral Resource Estimate into Indicated  and Inferred mineral resources  is consistent with current 2014 CIM  Definition Standards - For Mineral  Resources and Mineral Reserves.
 
All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.
 
The   mineral resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by a   continuous 3D wireframe model, and is considered to have reasonable   prospects for eventual economic extraction.
 
Mineral   resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated   economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of   confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must   not be converted to a Mineral Reserve.
 
The  Hyland  mineral resource estimate is based on a validated database  which  includes data from surface trenching, and surface diamond and RC   drilling completed between 1987 and 2018.
 
The MRE for Hyland is based on one three-dimensional ("3D") resource model representing the deposit.
 
Grades   for Au and Ag were estimated for each mineralization domain using 1.5   metre drill core and 2.0 metre channel composites assigned to that   domain. To generate grade within the blocks, the inverse distance cubed   (ID2) interpolation method was used. An average SG value of 3.04 was  used for tonnage calculation.
 
Based   on the location, surface exposure, size, shape, general true  thickness,  and orientation, it is envisioned that Hyland may be mined  using  open-pit mining methods. In-pit mineral resources are reported at  a base  case cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t AuEq. The in-pit resource grade  blocks  are quantified above the base case cut-off grade, above the  constraining  pit shell, below topography and within the constraining  mineralized  domain (the constraining volume).
 
The  pit  optimization and base-case cut-off grade consider a gold price of   $2,400/oz and a silver price of $28 /oz and considers a gold recovery  of  92% and silver recovery of 70%. The pit optimization and base case   cut-off grade also considers a mining cost of US$2.40/t mined, pit slope   of 55° degrees, and processing, treatment, refining, G&A and   transportation cost of USD$19.50/t of mineralized material.
 
The   results from the pit optimization, using the pseudoflow optimization   method in Whittle 2022, are used solely for the purpose of testing the   "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" by an open pit and do not   represent an attempt to estimate mineral reserves. There are no  mineral  reserves on the Project. The results are used simply as a guide  to  assist in the preparation of a mineral resource statement and to  select  an appropriate resource reporting cut-off grade. A Whittle pit  shell at a  revenue factor of 1.00 was selected as the ultimate pit  shell for the  purposes of the current MRE.
 
The   estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by   environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,   marketing, or other relevant issues.
 
 
 No capping of high-grade composites was  used in  this MRE. Analysis of the composite data indicates very few  outliers  within the database. Analysis of the spatial location of these  samples  and the sample values proximal to them led the independent QP  to believe  that the high values were legitimate parts of the population  and that  the impact of including these high composite values uncapped  would be  negligible to the overall resource estimate.
 
 The  estimation of gold grades into a block model was carried out with the  inverse distance squared (ID2)  interpolation method on uncapped  composites with the resultant block  model comprised of a block size of  5m (easting) x 5m (northing) x 5m  (elevation). Specific gravity was  estimated was based on 76 mineralized  samples and 67 waste rock  samples.
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Figure   3: Isometric view looking East Northeast: Mineral Resource Block  Grades  (upper) and Block Class (lower) for the Main Zone at Hyland. 
 
 
 
 
 
 Upcoming Events
 
 
 Quality Assurance, Quality Control Measures and Data VerificationNew Orleans Investment Conference - November 2 to 5, 2025
 
 Corporate Update and Breakfast - November 5, 7:15 AM CST
 
Deutsche Goldmesse Fall, Frankfurt - November 14 to 15, 2025
 
Yukon Geoscience Forum, Whitehorse - November 16 to 19, 2025
 
 
 The reported work was completed using industry standard procedures, including a quality assurance/quality control ("QA/QC")   program consisting of the insertion of certified reference materials,   field duplicates and coarse blanks into the sample stream and utilizing   certified independent analytical laboratories for all assays.   Additionally, historic QA/QC data and methodology on the Hyland Project   were reviewed and are summarized in the NI 43-101 Technical Report?.   Based on a review of all possible information, the author of the   Technical Report is of the opinion that the database is of sufficient   quality to be used for the current Indicated and Inferred MRE.
 
 A   robust system of standards, core duplicates and coarse blanks, was   implemented in all Banyan drilling programs and was monitored as   chemical assay data became available. All control samples were within   accuracy and precision thresholds required to meet data quality   standards. These control samples amounted to approximately 10% of all   samples submitted to analytical laboratories.
 
 All geological data in the MRE was reviewed and verified by SGS Canada Inc. - Geological Services ("SGS")   as being accurate to the extent possible and to the extent possible  all  geological information was reviewed and confirmed. SGS made site  visits  to the Hyland Project on October 12, 2011, September 19-20 2017  and  August 25-26, 2025 and observed Banyan's drilling and sampling   techniques, as well as viewed Hyland drill core. SGS confirms that the   assay sampling QA/QC protocols undertaken by Banyan provide adequate and   good verification of the data and believes the work to have been done   within the CIM guidelines.
 
 NI 43-101 Technical Report
 
 Additional   discussion and disclosure on the updated MRE, Hyland Mineral Resource   Model Data Verification, as well as on Project earn-in status,   underlying royalties and metallurgical test work completed by Banyan is   included in the NI 43-101 Technical Report which was filed on SEDAR+   with this release.
 
 Qualified Persons
 
 The   updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Hyland Project was prepared   by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P.Geo., Technical Manager and Senior Resource   Geologist, SGS Canada Inc. - Geological Services, an independent "Qualified Person" as required by NI 43-101, who has reviewed and approved the contents of this release and has verified the data disclosed as it relates to the MRE.
 
 Duncan Mackay, M.Sc., P.Geo., is a "Qualified Person" as ?defined under National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"),   and has reviewed and approved the content of this news release in   respect of all disclosure other than the MRE.? Mr. Mackay is Vice   President Exploration for Banyan and has verified the data disclosed in   this news release, including the sampling, ??analytical and test data   underlying the information.
 
 Analytical Method
 
 All   drill core and trench samples collected from the Hyland Gold program   were analyzed at Bureau Veritas Minerals of Burnaby, B.C., utilizing the   four-acid digestion ICP-MS 35-element MA300 analytical package with   FA450 50-gram Fire Assay with AAS finish for gold on all samples. All   core samples were split on-site at Banyan's core processing facilities   at the Hyland Gold Project. Once split, half samples were placed back in   the core boxes with the other half of split samples sealed in poly  bags  with one part of a three-part sample tag inserted within. All  these  samples were delivered by Banyan personnel or a dedicated  expediter to  the Bureau Veritas, Whitehorse preparatory laboratory  where samples are  prepared and then shipped to Bureau Veritas's  Analytical laboratory in  Burnaby, B.C., for pulverization and final  chemical analysis. A robust  system of standards was implemented in the  2017 exploration drilling  program and was monitored as chemical assay  data become available. A  more robust description of historic analytical  procedures will be  included in the forthcoming Hyland NI 43-101 report  to be filed on  SEDAR+.
 
 About Banyan
 
 Banyan's   primary asset, the AurMac Project is located in the Traditional   Territory of First Nation of Na-Cho Nyäk Dun, in Canada's Yukon   Territory. The current Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE")   for the AurMac Project has an effective date of June 28, 2025 and   comprises an Indicated Mineral Resource of 2.274 million ?ounces of gold   ("Au") (112.5 M tonnes at 0.63  g/t) and an Inferred  Mineral Resource of 5.453 M oz of Au (280.6 M  tonnes at 0.60 g/t )  (Table 3: as defined in the Canadian Institute of  Mining, Metallurgy and  Petroleum ("CIM")  Definition ?Standards for Mineral  Resources & Mineral Reserves  incorporated by reference into NI  43-101). The 303 square kilometres ("sq km")  AurMac  Project lies 40 km from Mayo, Yukon. The AurMac Project is  transected by  the main Yukon highway and benefits from a 3-phase  powerline, existing  power station and cell phone coverage.
 
 Table 3: Pit-Constrained Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources - AurMac Project
 
 
 Notes to Table 3:| Deposit 
 
 | Gold Cut-Off (g/t) 
 
 | Tonnage (M Tonnes)
 
 
 | Average Gold Grade (g/t) 
 
 | Contained Gold (Moz) 
 
 |  | Indicated MRE 
 
 | 
 
 |  | Airstrip 
 
 | 0.30 
 
 | 27.7 
 
 | 0.69 
 
 | 0.611 
 
 |  | Powerline 
 
 | 0.30 
 
 | 84.8 
 
 | 0.61 
 
 | 1.663 
 
 |  | Total Combined Indicated MRE 
 
 | 0.30 
 
 | 112.5 
 
 | 0.63 
 
 | 2.274 
 
 |  | Inferred MRE 
 
 | 
 
 |  | Airstrip 
 
 | 0.30 
 
 | 10.1 
 
 | 0.75 
 
 | 0.245 
 
 |  | Powerline 
 
 | 0.30 
 
 | 270.4 
 
 | 0.60 
 
 | 5.208 
 
 |  | Total Combined Inferred MRE 
 
 | 0.30 
 
 | 280.6 
 
 | 0.60 
 
 | 5.453 
 
 | 
 
 
 In  addition to  the AurMac Project, the Company holds the Hyland Gold  Project, located  70 km Northeast of Watson Lake, Yukon, along the  Southeast end of the  Tintina Gold Belt (the "Hyland Project")   in the Traditional Territory of the Kaska Nations, closest to the  Liard  First Nation and Daylu Dena Council. The Hyland Project  represents a  sediment hosted, structurally controlled, intrusion  related gold  deposit, within a large land package (over 125 sq km),  accessible by a  network of existing gravel access roads.The   effective date for the MRE is June 28, 2025 and was prepared by Marc   Jutras, P.Eng., M.A.Sc., Principal, Ginto Consulting Inc., an   independent "Qualified Person" within the meaning of NI 43-101.
 
Mineral   Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated   economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially   affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation,   sociopolitical, marketing, changes in global gold markets or other   relevant issues.
 
The CIM Definition Standards were   followed for classification of Mineral Resources. The quantity and grade   of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are  uncertain  in nature ?and there has been insufficient exploration to  define these  Inferred Mineral Resources as an ?Indicated Mineral  Resource.
 
Mineral  Resources are reported at a cut-off  grade of 0.30 g/t gold for all  deposits, using a US$/CAN$ exchange rate  of 0.73 and constrained within  an open pit shell optimized with the  Lerchs-Grossman algorithm to  constrain the Mineral Resources with the  following estimated parameters:  gold price of US$2,050/ounce, US$2.50/t  mining cost, US$10.00/t  processing cost, US$2.00/t G+A, 90% gold  recoveries, and 45° pit slopes.1
 
The  number of tonnes  and ounces was rounded to the nearest thousand. Any  discrepancies in  the totals are due to rounding effects.
 
 
 Banyan  also holds the  Nitra Gold Project, a grassroots exploration project  located in the Mayo  Mining district, approximately 10 km west of the  AurMac Gold property.  The Nitra Property lies in the northern part of  the Selwyn basin and is  underlain by metaclastic rocks of the Late  Proterozoic Yusezyu Formation  of the Hyland Group, similar to  lithologies hosting portions of the  AurMac Project. Middle Cretaceous  Tombstone Plutonic suite intrusions  occur along the property including  the Morrison Creek and Minto Creek  stocks. The property is 100% owned  and operated by Banyan Gold  Corporation ("Banyan") and covers  approximately 313.9 sq km. The  property is accessible by road along the  Silver Trail Highway, South  McQuesten Road and 4x4 roads.
 
 Banyan trades on the TSX-Venture Exchange under the symbol "BYN" and is quoted on the OTCQB Venture Market under the symbol "BYAGF". For more information, please visit the corporate website at or contact the Company.
 
 ON BEHALF OF BANYAN GOLD CORPORATION
 
 (signed) "Tara Christie"
 Tara Christie
 President & CEO
 
 For more information, please contact:
 Tara Christie • 778 928 0556 •  tchristie@banyangold.com
 Jasmine Sangria • 604 312 5610 •  jsangria@banyangold.com
 
 CAUTIONARY   STATEMENT: Neither the TSX Venture Exchange, its Regulation Services   Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture   Exchange) nor OTCQB Venture Market accepts responsibility for the   adequacy or accuracy of this release.
 
 No   stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority  has  approved or disapproved the information contained herein.
 
 FORWARD   LOOKING INFORMATION: This news release contains forward-looking   information, which is not comprised of historical facts and is based   upon the Company's current internal expectations, estimates,   projections, assumptions and beliefs. Such information can generally be   identified by the use of forwarding-looking wording such as "may",   "will", "expect", "estimate", "anticipate", "intend(s)", "believe",   "potential" and "continue" or the negative thereof or similar   variations. Forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties   and other factors that could cause actual events, results, performance,   prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed  or  implied by such forward-looking information. Forward looking   information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the   Company's MRE in respect of the Project, plans for exploration; and   statements regarding exploration expectations, prospectivity of the   Company's property interests, potential mining processes, pricing   assumptions and costs ease and confidence in increasing ounces,   exploration or development plans and timelines; mineral resource   estimates; mineral recoveries and anticipated mining costs. Factors that   could cause actual results to differ materially from such   forward-looking information include uncertainties inherent in resource   estimates, continuity and extent of mineralization, capital and   operating costs varying significantly from estimates, the preliminary   nature of metallurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to   obtain required governmental, environmental or other project  approvals,  political risks, uncertainties relating to the availability  and costs  of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets,  inflation,  changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity  prices, and the  other risks involved in the mineral exploration and  development  industry, enhanced risks inherent to conducting business in  any  jurisdiction, timing and those risks set out in Banyan's public   documents filed on SEDAR. Although Banyan believes that the assumptions   and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this   news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such   information, which only applies as of the date of this news release,   and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the   disclosed time frames or at all. Banyan disclaims any intention or   obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether   as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than   as required by law.
 
 SOURCE: Banyan Gold Corp.
 
 
 |