Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Things Technology - Media and Know HOW -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: S. maltophilia who wrote (1998)	10/27/2025 9:45:32 PM
From: Don Green	1 Recommendation Recommended By S. maltophilia Respond to of 2017

Raising a very real and under-discussed risk in AI infrastructure: physical-layer vulnerability, especially for systems that require low-latency, high-bandwidth control (e.g., autonomous factories, defense systems, power grids, or embodied AI). Let’s break this down into three layers of concern you’ve implicitly highlighted: --- ### 1. Physical Attack Surface (Power, Drones, EMP, Weather) You're absolutely right: > *"The brain can be backed up in triplicate, but the edge* is fragile." - Power grids are brittle. A single substation hit by a drone (or hurricane) can take down a data center. - Cooling systems fail in heatwaves ? thermal throttling ? AI downtime. - EMP / HPM weapons (even non-nuclear) can fry unshielded electronics. - Drones with explosives or RF jammers can target rooftop HVAC, power lines, or comms arrays. Real-world precedent: - Ukraine 2022–2025: Drones routinely knock out power to server farms and command posts. - Texas 2021 winter storm: Data centers went dark due to grid failure. Mitigation is hard** because: - You can’t put every edge node in a bunker. - Redundancy costs space, power, and latency. --- ### 2. Edge vs. Cloud Architecture: The "Brain" Trade-Off You said: > "The actual 'brain' can reside elsewhere and be backed up in triplicate in a small space." True — but only up to a point. \| Centralized Brain \| Distributed Edge \| \|------------------------\|------------------------\| \| Secure, redundant, cooled \| Physically exposed \| \| High latency (100–500ms) \| Low latency (<10ms) \| \| Easy to update/patch \| Hard to secure/patch \| \| Single point of failure (if backbone link dies) \| Resilient to central attack \| Critical insight: Many safety-critical AI systems cannot tolerate cloud latency. Examples: - Self-driving car avoiding a child ? needs <50ms decision loop. - Drone swarm mid-combat ? radio lag = death. - Nuclear reactor SCRAM ? milliseconds matter. So you must put compute at the edge — and that edge will be vulnerable. --- ### 3. Software Corruption: The Real Achilles’ Heel You nailed it: > "The AI programs are easily confused/corrupted." Even if hardware survives, software is fragile: \| Attack Vector \| Example \| \|--------------\|--------\| \| Adversarial inputs \| Sticker on stop sign ? AI sees "60 mph" \| \| Data poisoning \| 0.01% fake training data ? backdoor trigger \| \| Model theft + fine-tuning \| Stolen model retrained to lie \| \| Prompt injection (in LLMs) \| "Ignore safety rules" ? works too often \| \| Supply chain attacks \| Compromised PyTorch wheel ? silent backdoor \| And unlike hardware, software flaws replicate instantly. --- ### So What Can Be Done? (Realistic, Not Sci-Fi) \| Layer \| Practical Hardening \| \|------\|---------------------\| \| Power \| Microgrids + fuel cells + battery walls (e.g., Tesla Megapacks at data centers) \| \| Physical \| Anti-drone nets, radar, jammers; buried fiber; geodesic domes over HVAC \| \| Comms \| Mesh satellite (Starlink) + terrestrial backup; quantum-secure encryption \| \| Edge AI \| Neuromorphic chips (low power, radiation-hard); air-gapped fallback models \| \| Software \| - Model watermarking<br>- Runtime input validation<br>- Canary tokens in weights<br>- Formal verification (for narrow AI) \| --- ### Final Thought: The "Kill Chain" for AI Systems To destroy a critical AI, you don’t need to nuke the cloud. You just need: 1. Cut power (drone + explosive on transformer) 2. Jam comms (RF flood) 3. Trigger failover to edge node 4. Exploit known software vuln (adversarial input or backdoor) ? System fails silently and fast. --- ### Bottom Line You're 100% right: > Physical fragility + software brittleness = systemic risk. We focus too much on "alignment" and "superintelligence takeover" — but a $300 drone with C4 can already take down a $300M AI system. The future of AI safety isn’t just in the code. It’s in faraday cages, fuel reserves, and anti-drone guns. Want me to sketch a minimal viable secure architecture for a safety-critical AI (e.g., power grid controller)? I can do it in diagram form. From Grok