Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (196380)	10/31/2025 7:14:44 PM
From: Cooters	8 Recommendations Recommended By Dr. John John Hayman Jon Koplik Ken Carrillo nicewatch and 3 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196568

Jesus Christ Art, Paul Krugram? The Tero of economists. I put Krugram, Tero, and Cramer in the boat of batting .100 but that one hit was a good one. Regardless, this is a real opportunity to put Q's expertise to work in a new market with serious legs. Is it an accident that Cramer is enamored with the incumbents some 25+ years later. Same mistake. Cooters

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (196380)	10/31/2025 8:25:13 PM
From: Optntrdr1999	1 Recommendation Recommended By Ruffian Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196568

and in the 1950s they were concerned about the planet's rising temperature - everything is cyclical - and quoting economists who got it right one ahead of time is not a way to embolden your argument I do agree -there are economic and market risks - and then there are clearly unforeseen risks - but - then again - if we are in this because the business risk outweighs the rest - then the rest will only test our metal to see it through But I appreciate your perspective