SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (28865)2/25/1998 7:43:00 PM
From: StockMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573683
 
Ali babble,
Re -- If we think about business..

Of course we should, like all the K6's that have been sold to business.

Re -- Matrox Millenium PCI

No AGP? really...

You guys are entertaining, keep it coming.

Stockman



To: Ali Chen who wrote (28865)2/25/1998 8:40:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573683
 
Ali, based on your benchmark figures for castrated Covington chip, its a totally useless chip until June.

June is when $20 cheaper 440-EX chipset is supposed to ship from Intel, according to heise.de
This is a good article on internals of the Deschutes module. For example, then found a 4% performance penalty because the L2 cache is not interleaved anymore.

IMO, Intel might as well not even release the Covington until then, its performance will be so bad.

The EX chipset will allow external L2 cache and support 100 MHz bus. Plus, by then Intel will probably have double L1 cache on-chip. With 100 MHz Intel-spec SDRAM (more expensive), and $10 L2 cache, Intel will probably get the Winbench up to only a 10% penalty. So Intel will save $20 per chip production costs but force the user to spend it on faster memory.

But who will want a MMX-200 class CPU then?

Oh, one other thing -- the EX chipset will only support 3 PCI slots and 2 SDRAM modules. Lets see, 3D accelerator board, PCI sound card, network card and I'm full. No place to put SCSI or video capture or cable modem board or whatever!

Petz



To: Ali Chen who wrote (28865)2/25/1998 8:45:00 PM
From: Investor A  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573683
 
Ali,

It is not fare to compare the cacheless PII-266 with K6-166 512K cache!

K6-166 512K is faster than PMMX-200 256K. You cheat! :)



To: Ali Chen who wrote (28865)2/25/1998 10:37:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573683
 
<Covington, its 10% slower than an equivalent 266 Mhz pentiumII.>

Ali, how about reruning those benchmarks under NT and posting the results.

EP