SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/25/1998 8:00:00 PM
From: Mitch Blevins  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 480
 
Oh.... I guess I need to get a bigger bucket. <eom>



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 9:43:00 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 480
 
the site web Art Bell

artbell.com



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 9:47:00 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 480
 
My Dear Friends

artbell.com



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 10:50:00 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 480
 
faster than light discussion

Raymond Y. Chiao is professor of physics at the University of California,
Berkeley. He replies:

"Briefly, tachyons are theoretically postulated particles that travel faster than light
and have 'imaginary' masses.[Editor's note: imaginary mass is a bizarre theoretical
concept that comes from taking the square root of a negative number; in this case, it
roughly means that a particle's mass is only physically meaningful at speeds greater
than light.]

"The name 'tachyon' (from the Greek 'tachys,' meaning swift) was coined by the late
Gerald Feinberg of Columbia University. Tachyons have never been found in
experiments as real particles traveling through the vacuum, but we predict
theoretically that tachyon-like objects exist as faster-than-light 'quasiparticles'
moving through laser-like media. (That is, they exist as particle-like excitations,
similar to other quasiparticles called phonons and polaritons that are found in solids.
'Laser-like media' is a technical term referring to those media that have inverted
atomic populations, the conditions prevailing inside a laser.)

"We are beginning an experiment at Berkeley to detect tachyon-like quasiparticles.
There are strong scientific reasons to believe that such quasiparticles really exist,
because Maxwell's equations, when coupled to inverted atomic media, lead
inexorably to tachyon-like solutions.

"Quantum optical effects can produce a different kind of 'faster than light' effect (see
"Faster than light?" by R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat, and A. M. Steinberg in Scientific
American, August 1993). There are actually two different kinds of
'faster-than-light' effects that we have found in quantum optics experiments. (The
tachyon-like quasiparticle in inverted media described above is yet a third kind of
faster-than-light effect.)

"First, we have discovered that photons which tunnel through a quantum barrier can
apparently travel faster than light (see "Measurement of the Single-Photon Tunneling
Time" by A. M. Steinberg, P. G. Kwiat, and R. Y. Chiao, Physical Review
Letters, Vol. 71, page 708; 1993). Because of the uncertainty principle, the photon
has a small but very real chance of appearing suddenly on the far side of the barrier,
through a quantum effect (the 'tunnel effect') which would seem impossible
according to classical physics. The tunnel effect is so fast that it seems to occur
faster than light.

"Second, we have found an effect related to the famous Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen
phenomenon, in which two distantly separated photons can apparently influence one
anothers' behaviors at two distantly separated detectors (see "High-Visibility
Interference in a Bell-Inequality Experiment for Energy and Time," by P. G. Kwiat,
A. M. Steinberg, and R. Y. Chiao, Physical Review A, Vol. 47, page R2472;
1993). This effect was first predicted theoretically by Prof. J. D. Franson of Johns
Hopkins University. We have found experimentally that twin photons emitted from a
common source (a down-conversion crystal) behave in a correlated fashion when
they arrive at two distant interferometers. This phenomenon can be described as a
'faster-than-light influence' of one photon upon its twin. Because of the intrinsic
randomness of quantum phenomena, however, one cannot control whether a given
photon tunnels or not, nor can one control whether a given photon is transmitted or
not at the final beam splitter. Hence it is impossible to send true signals in
faster-than-light communications.

"I refer interested readers to our paper 'Tachyonlike Excitations in Inverted
Two-Level Media' by R. Y. Chiao, A. E. Kozhekin, and G. Kurizki, Physical
Review Letters, Vol. 77, page 1254; 1996, and references therein."



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 480
 
Tachyons Rebuttal

There was a young lady named Bright,
Whose speed was far faster than light.
She went out one day,
In a relative way,
And returned the previous night!

-Reginald Buller

It is a well known fact that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. At best, a massless particle travels at the speed of light. But is this really true? In 1962, Bilaniuk, Deshpande, and
Sudarshan, Am. J. Phys. 30, 718 (1962), said "no". A very readable paper is Bilaniuk and Sudarshan, Phys. Today 22,43 (1969). I give here a brief overview.

Draw a graph, with momentum (p) on the x-axis, and energy (E) on the y-axis. Then draw the "light cone", two lines with the equations E = +/- p. This divides our 1+1 dimensional space-time into two
regions. Above and below are the "timelike" quadrants, and to the left and right are the "spacelike" quadrants.

Now the fundamental fact of relativity is that E2 - p2 = m2. (Let's take c=1 for the rest of the discussion.) For any non-zero value of m (mass), this is an hyperbola with branches in the timelike
regions. It passes through the point (p,E) = (0,m), where the particle is at rest. Any particle with mass m is constrained to move on the upper branch of this hyperbola. (Otherwise, it is "off-shell", a
term you hear in association with virtual particles - but that's another topic.) For massless particles, E2 = p2, and the particle moves on the light-cone.

These two cases are given the names tardyon (or bradyon in more modern usage) and luxon, for "slow particle" and "light particle". Tachyon is the name given to the supposed "fast particle" which would move with v>c. (Tachyons were first introduced into physics by Gerald Feinberg, in his seminal paper "On the possibility of faster-than-light particles" [Phys.Rev. v.159, pp.1089--1105
(1967)]).

Now another familiar relativistic equation is E = m*[1-(v/c)2]-1/2. Tachyons (if they exist) have v > c. This means that E is imaginary! Well, what if we take the rest mass m, and take it to be imaginary?
Then E is negative real, and E2 - p2 = m2 < 0. Or, p2 - E2 = M2, where M is real. This is a hyperbola with branches in the spacelike region of spacetime. The energy and momentum of a tachyon must satisfy this relation.

You can now deduce many interesting properties of tachyons. For example, they accelerate (p goes up) if they lose energy (E goes down). Furthermore, a zero-energy tachyon is "transcendent," or
infinitely fast. This has profound consequences. For example, let's say that there were electrically charged tachyons. Since they would move faster than the speed of light in the vacuum, they should
produce Cherenkov radiation. This would lower their energy, causing them to accelerate more! In other words, charged tachyons would probably lead to a runaway reaction releasing an arbitrarily
large amount of energy. This suggests that coming up with a sensible theory of anything except free (noninteracting) tachyons is likely to be difficult. Heuristically, the problem is that we can get
spontaneous creation of tachyon-antitachyon pairs, then do a runaway reaction, making the vacuum unstable. To treat this precisely requires quantum field theory, which gets complicated. It is not easy to summarize results here. However, one reasonably modern reference is Tachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978).

However, tachyons are not entirely invisible. You can imagine that you might produce them in some exotic nuclear reaction. If they are charged, you could "see" them by detecting the Cherenkov light
they produce as they speed away faster and faster. Such experiments have been done. So far, no tachyons have been found. Even neutral tachyons can scatter off normal matter with experimentally
observable consequences. Again, no such tachyons have been found.

How about using tachyons to transmit information faster than the speed of light, in violation of Special Relativity? It's worth noting that when one considers the relativistic quantum mechanics of tachyons, the question of whether they "really" go faster than the speed of light becomes much more touchy! In this framework, tachyons are waves that satisfy a wave equation. Let's treat free tachyons of spin zero, for simplicity. We'll set c = 1 to keep things less messy. The wavefunction of a single such tachyon can be expected to satisfy the usual equation for spin-zero particles, the Klein-Gordon equation:

(BOX + m2)phi = 0

where BOX is the D'Alembertian, which in 3+1 dimensions is just

BOX = (d/dt)2 - (d/dx)2 - (d/dy)2 - (d/dz)2.

The difference with tachyons is that m2 is negative, and m is imaginary.

To simplify the math a bit, let's work in 1+1 dimensions, with co-ordinates x and t, so that

BOX = (d/dt)2 - (d/dx)2

Everything we'll say generalizes to the real-world 3+1-dimensional case. Now - regardless of m, any solution is a linear combination, or superposition, of solutions of the form

phi(t,x) = exp(-iEt + ipx)

where E2 - p2 = m2. When m2 is negative there are two essentially different cases. Either |p| >= |E|, in which case E is real and we get solutions that look like waves whose crests move along at the rate
|p|/|E| >= 1, i.e., no slower than the speed of light. Or |p| < |E|, in which case E is imaginary and we get solutions that look waves that amplify exponentially as time passes!

We can decide as we please whether or not we want to consider the second sort of solutions. They seem weird, but then the whole business is weird, after all.

1) If we do permit the second sort of solution, we can solve the Klein-Gordon equation with any reasonable initial data - that is, any reasonable values of phi and its first time derivative at t = 0. (For
the precise definition of "reasonable," consult your local mathematician.) This is typical of wave equations. And, also typical of wave equations, we can prove the following thing: If the solution phi and its time derivative are zero outside the interval [-L,L] when t = 0, they will be zero outside the interval [-L-|t|, L+|t|] at any time t. In other words, localized disturbances do not spread with speed faster than the speed of light! This seems to go against our notion that tachyons move faster than the speed of light, but it's a mathematical fact, known as "unit propagation velocity".

2) If we don't permit the second sort of solution, we can't solve the Klein-Gordon equation for all reasonable initial data, but only for initial data whose Fourier transforms vanish in the interval
[-|m|,|m|]. By the Paley-Wiener theorem this has an odd consequence: it becomes impossible to solve the equation for initial data that vanish outside some interval [-L,L]! In other words, we can no
longer "localize" our tachyon in any bounded region in the first place, so it becomes impossible to decide whether or not there is "unit propagation velocity" in the precise sense of part 1). Of course, the crests of the waves exp(-iEt + ipx) move faster than the speed of light, but these waves were never localized in the first place!

The bottom line is that you can't use tachyons to send information faster than the speed of light from one place to another. Doing so would require creating a message encoded some way in a localized
tachyon field, and sending it off at superluminal speed toward the intended receiver. But as we have seen you can't have it both ways - localized tachyon disturbances are subluminal and superluminal
disturbances are nonlocal.



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 11:04:00 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 480
 
FASTER THAN LIGHT: SUPERLUMINAL LOOPHOLES IN PHYSICS

What's so special about the speed of light? Why do physicists like Einstein say that nothing can exceed light speed (Warp Speed 1 in Star Trek)? Is it possible to evade this speed limit using exotic devices? What about time travel? (The Japanese edition of this book is called: "How to Make a Time Machine").

FTL reveals the fundamental postulate that lies behind the Einstein speed limit--the so-called Causal Ordering Principle (COP) that requires all causal processes (such as signals) to have the same time
direction for all observers. Space and time may be different for different observers but causal ordering must be the same for all. Backwards-in-time causal processes are not forbidden (by relativity at least) but such processes must appear to go backwards in time for all observers. On page 59, Nick lists 14 "things" that go faster than light--including comet tails and the subjective velocity of a space traveller in a near-lightspeed ship--but none of these apparently superluminal "things" can be used to send signals so they are immune from the COP rule.

FTL examines several "loopholes" in the subluminal speed law many of which have already been examined by science fiction writers including warped space-time such as will be encountered in the vicinity of black holes, "phase waves" which for some situations are compelled to always travel faster than light, and the mysterious "quantum connection" recently proved necessarily superluminal by Irish physicist John Bell.

FTL introduces plausible time travel devices such as the massive rotating Tipler Top and particular attempts to exploit the quantum connection to send superluminal signals.

FTL examines the logical paradoxes that time travel might introduce and suggests ways in which the universe might resolve these paradoxes.

"The Enterprise's maximum cruising speed is Warp 6 (216 times light speed). At Warp 6, travel time to the nearest star (4 light-years distant) is about a week. To the crew of the Enterprise, warp drive technology makes star systems seem as close together as Pacific islands in the days of clipper ships." (FTL p 16)

"The attempt to send FTL messages via Bell's quantum connection can be compared to the attempt to utilize superluminal phase velocity for the same ends. In the quantum case, the message does not get through because to the receiver the signal looks utterly random. On the other hand, the superluminal phase wave is perfectly periodic--an infinitely long and infinitely boring sine wave, whose monotonously identical peaks and valleys are unblemished by any message. But perfect randomness and perfect order are equally devoid of meaning. Only a signal that lies somewhere between these two extremes qualifies as a meaningful message." (FTL p 178)

"Special relativity, which in conjunction with the COP rule seems to outlaw time travel, paradoxically provides the main reason for a physicist to believe in time travel because relativity seems to assert
that time is a dimension on a par with space. If time is like space then the past must literally still exist "back there" as surely as Moscow still exists even after I have left it. If the past still exists, then it makes sense to consider whether one could actually travel there." (FTL p 191)



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 480
 
Warp Technology Possible

The Warp Drive has long been a staple of science fiction adventures. "Warping" magical device the propels our heroes (or villains) at mind-boggling speeds--much faster than light speed--from one star to the next, in the time it takes us to pop down the street to the local Circle K.

Most scientists have scoffed at the idea of traveling at speeds faster than light, dismissing it as an absolute impossibility. And they did so on the foundation of some very hard (and proven) scientific theory: Albert Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity. Einstein's theory states that no physical object in the universe can exceed the speed of light (186,000 m.p.h.).

See, as an object travels closer and closer to the speed of light, its mass (in equivalent energy) gets greater and greater in a geometrically increasing fashion; the closer to light speed, the closer mass-equivalent-energy gets to infinite. The background image shows a cubic lattice as it would appear to an observer approaching at an extremely relativistic velocity.

Also, for any travelers on board a starship traveling close to the speed of light, time outside would appear to pass faster and faster. And as we would see it, time would pass slower and slower for our
friends on the starship. This effect is best illustrated in the "Twin Paradox" where one twin accelerates off to a distant star and the other twin stays at home. When traveling twin returns home, he finds that millions of years have past on the Earth.

Imagine that your position is represented by the graph below, a so-called "world line"--your track through space-time. Because of the light-speed limit, you can only affect particles in your "future light
cone." Likewise, only particles in your "past light cone" can have effected you. Thus, the existence of an ultimate speed limit defines strictly the temporal relation of events--in other words, cause and
effect. To travel faster than light--if one could--could result in all sorts of causal paradoxes; events seeming to precede causes.

However, one physicist thinks that he may have found a way to circumvent this universal speed limit, and allow for the possibility of a real warp drive--someday.

The credit goes not to the fictional Zefrem Cocrane of Star Trek fame, but to Miguel Alcubierre, a physicist at the University of Cardiff in Wales, England. Alcubierre, claims to have found a loop-hole in Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, that allows for this kind of faster than light travel. According to General Relativity, space is not a static entity, but a space and time make up an 4-dimensional "space-time", a "dynamical entity" that can be twisted and distorted by concentrations of matter and energy.

According to Alcubierre's theory, it would be possible to generate a distortion in this "space-time continuum"--a space warp, using something called "exotic matter", both in front of and behind an
object, that would propel it faster than light. Specifically, space-time is contracted in front of the ship and expanded behind it. Creating the "warp field" in which the object travels in like a surfer travels on a wave, and with no speed limit.

The spaceship itself would not be accelerating, and experiences no time dilation. Exotic matter is a hypothetical form of matter (predicted in Inflationary Big Bang Cosmology) that has a "negative
energy density". In other words; it creates a kind of negative pressure around it, and is repelled--not attracted--by gravity. (The existence of negative energy densities, has been proven in laboratory
experiments).

According to Alcubierre's equations, there would be none of the time dilation effects experienced by astronauts traveling close to light speed in normal space. And the ship could slow down or speed up
as fast as its pilots pleased, without the fear that they would be reduced to the very consistency of strawberry jam by the inertial forces. Inside the warp field, the astronauts would have zero
acceleration relative to the space around them. All of this, remember, depends on the yet unproven existence of exotic matter. It may very well NOT exist. And even if it does, the question remains, could one generate and control it?

This makes many dismiss Alcubierre's theory as nothing more than an interesting mathematical abstraction, (and certainly it is not by any means absolute proof that FTL travel is possible--let alone
a blueprint for a starship). But until Alcubeirres theory, even the possibility of FTL travel was dismissed outright. Now a door may have been opened, where it leads, if indeed it leads anywhere, is for another generation of physicists to figure out. (As one pointy-eared fictional space traveller once remarked: "There are always possibilities...") It will still be a long time before Kirks and
Picards will be zipping around in starships powered by real warp drives. But until then, sci-fi fans and authors (and dreamers) may take some comfort in the knowledge that their warp drive may not
be just a silly fiction, but may be a real possibility someday.

For a more detailed explanation of this theory, check out: the May issue of Classical and Quantum Gravity. and September-October issue of American Scientist, Vol. 82 "Space-Time Hypersurfing". pp(422-423)

seds.org

seds.org



Bryce Burchett & Chris C. Stephenson.



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 12:15:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 480
 
Useful Science Fiction and Fact Pages

city-net.com



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 12:16:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 480
 
pulp zone

ip.pt



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 12:19:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 480
 
science fiction links on the www

cybertown.com



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (2)2/26/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 480
 
Gamera vs. Gaos

tswww.cc.emory.edu