Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pocotrader who wrote (1570448)	11/6/2025 2:39:17 PM
From: the traveler	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572777

of course it was my opinion. i don't normally go around stating other peoples opinion. do you?

To: pocotrader who wrote (1570448)	11/6/2025 2:42:54 PM
From: pocotrader	2 Recommendations Recommended By Doren Goose94 Respond to of 1572777

Panic Spreading Through GOP After DOJ Reveals Epstein Files Are More Damaging For Trump Than They Thought: Report Panic is reportedly spreading among Republicans as whispers grow louder about what’s hidden in the unreleased Jeffrey Epstein files — and just how bad they could be for Donald Trump. According to veteran journalist David Shuster, who has worked with MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News, several House Republicans have heard directly from Department of Justice contacts that the Epstein documents are “especially compromising” for the president. Shuster posted the bombshell on Wednesday, writing on X that “speculation/rumors [are] sweeping through [the] GOP caucus” about what’s inside the files. “A few GOP house members say they’ve heard from FBI/DOJ contacts that the Epstein files (with copies in different agencies) are worse than Michael Wolff’s description of Epstein photos showing Trump with half naked teenage girls,” Shuster wrote. That comment points to an earlier interview with Trump biographer Michael Wolff, who told the Daily Beast in October that he had personally seen “about a dozen Polaroid snapshots” of Trump and Epstein. Wolff said the photos showed Trump with “several topless young women on his lap,” and that Epstein “pulled the photos out of a safe and spread them out like a deck of cards” while Wolff was visiting. According to the author, Epstein wanted him to write a book about his life. If that sounds incriminating, Shuster’s report suggests the DOJ’s files could be even worse. The story took another twist during Attorney General Pam Bondi’s recent appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee. When Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) asked Bondi whether she had personally seen any of the photos seized from Epstein’s safe, she dodged the question — and then fired back by grilling Whitehouse about campaign donations from LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, who also had ties to Epstein. “She didn’t give a denial,” Shuster noted. That moment, according to Shuster, left Republican lawmakers “spooked.” Bondi’s refusal to answer — especially given her close ties to Trump — raised new fears about what could surface if the Epstein files are made public. Meanwhile, Shuster says “more than 100+ Republicans” are preparing to side with Democrats on a bipartisan discharge petition led by Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.). The petition, which would force a vote to release the Epstein documents, is just one signature away from success. Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.), who recently won a special election to replace her late father, has vowed to provide that final signature once she’s sworn in. Between the whispers from DOJ insiders, Bondi’s evasive testimony, and growing bipartisan support to unseal the Epstein files, Republicans appear to be in a full-blown state of alarm. If the rumours are true, the worst may still be ahead — and the fallout could be devastating.