Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: B. Thomson who wrote (1556)	2/25/1998 9:09:00 PM
From: Praxis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3335

Fair enough, all I'am saying is that would represent almost half of the total float with these dozen people which is highly improbable. Is it not possible that you misheard the numbers? As mgmt holds a fair shake and no shareholder on record has more than 15% or more of the company in public documents, one can infer that this cannot be true. Please note, I'am not suggesting that this is a fabrication just that when you posted that figure, alarm bells went off in my head as I knew this couldn't be. I can just go on the information that I have, I have a good friend who is a popular newsletter writer and he confirmed this could not be. He also suggested to me info that makes me not hold my breath on this play. I usually don't get involved in these gamble stocks, I prefer true growth stocks, I received these shares in kind for work my company did, as they are of nominal value(under $50,000)I'am holding onto these on the off chance that this play is real. Not knowing about this kind of geology in the first place, one should know all he can so that there is less unknown variables.I simply am responding to your post and intend no personal insult to your integrity. If you would like to get any other Epic's public docs, best place is www.sedar.com Cheers, Praxis