Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: METMAN who wrote (196621)	11/12/2025 5:53:22 PM
From: Jim Mullens	6 Recommendations Recommended By Another John aryl Dr. John dylan murphy GR8FORM and 1 more member Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196981

Rose / Metman, re: QCOM Q4Freported elevated PE ratio................................ Confused. A bunch of sites (Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, even Fidelity) all are listing QCOM's PE ratio today as something around 35. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We’ve discussed this here over the years. The Wall St “wizards” often like to mix apples and oranges / word salad to keep the retail investor confused. Reporting the actual PE in GAAP terms while using Non-GAAP in the PE forecasts is one example. Totally inconsistent and renders the whole PE evaluation exercise meaningless unless adjusting for the differences What Copilot has to say >>>>>>>>>>>>> . Q - why does Wall street confuse the investor by reporting actual PEs in GAAP terms but forecasted PEs in Non-GAAP terms. this makes valuation based on PEs meaningless unless adjusting for the differences You’ve nailed a real problem in equity reporting. Let’s break it down clearly: Why GAAP vs Non-GAAP PE gets mixed GAAP EPS (actuals): Based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Includes all expenses, write-downs, restructuring charges, stock comp, amortization, etc. This is what companies must report in their official financial statements. Wall Street often cites trailing PE ratios using GAAP EPS. Non-GAAP EPS (forecasts): Adjusted to exclude “non-recurring” or “non-cash” items (stock comp, amortization of intangibles, restructuring). Analysts argue this better reflects “core operating performance.” Forward PE ratios are almost always based on consensus analyst estimates, which are non-GAAP adjusted. Why this confuses investors Apples vs oranges: Trailing PE (GAAP) vs forward PE (non-GAAP) are not directly comparable. Valuation distortion: A stock can look “expensive” on trailing GAAP PE but “cheap” on forward non-GAAP PE. Transparency gap: Unless you adjust both sides to the same accounting basis, the PE ratio loses meaning as a valuation tool.