SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: williamjs who wrote (48873)2/25/1998 11:24:00 PM
From: Naggrachi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
<<Motley Fools attempt at debating IOM's future>>

Your absolutely right, it was VERY lame!

I'm open minded to bear arguments, especially if they hold water, can't say that about what I read on the bear side. The bull part... I read his rationale earlier in a post which makes a little sense, however, could've done better.

Zead



To: williamjs who wrote (48873)2/26/1998 2:55:00 AM
From: Kashish King  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Not a particularly satisfying diatribe. Having said that, the points which the IOM bear did manage to effectively articulate did hit the mark and I assume from that the bull conceded the argument -- didn't actually read the bull's argument as I assumed it was just boiler plate IOM rhetoric.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News