SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN who wrote (196675)11/19/2025 12:11:56 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Lance Bredvold
manning18
matherandlowell

  Respond to of 197009
 
QHT -- The KFTC, along with Qualcomm and its action against ARM may be able to determine whether ARM has incorporated and infringed on any Qualcomm patents in its chip designs. ARM had access to QCOM chip designs in its earlier lawsuit against QCOM, in which ARM complained that QCOM illegally used IP developed by Nuvia, based on ARM architecture. ARM lost that suit. Turnabout is fair play.

Art



To: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN who wrote (196675)11/23/2025 1:00:53 PM
From: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN16 Recommendations

Recommended By
abd4b
AlfaNut
GR8FORM
jazzcat2000
JeffreyHF

and 11 more members

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197009
 
From the court Qualcomm v. Arm: The redacted documents for both parties' expert witnesses, rebuttals, summary judgments, etc are all available. I've been pouring through about 5,000 pages of redacted documents and will post a few times today to cover what's in there. It's been difficult for me to come up with a singular post that flows across all the documents (I'm not a journalist i'm not good at that) so I plan to split it up into specific items.

But in reference to the regulators Amon and Ann Chaplin confirm that they're not aware of anyone in QC leaking anything to the press regarding this.

Amon Depo



Ann Chaplin depo: