Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mongo2116 who wrote (1572640)	11/20/2025 7:23:52 AM
From: Maple MAGA	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579757

This whole write-up reads less like legal analysis and more like partisan fan-fiction dressed up as “BREAKING NEWS.” First, Ty Cobb hasn’t been part of Trump’s legal orbit for years. He’s made a second career out of trashing Trump on cable news, so pretending he’s some neutral insider is laughable. Calling his MSNBC soundbite an “explosive interview” is just MSNBC doing what MSNBC does — feeding its audience exactly what it wants to hear. Second, none of the people screaming online have actual access to the case record, grand jury transcripts, or internal DOJ procedures. Legal Twitter and cable panels pretending they know the internal mechanics of a sealed grand jury process is entertainment, not evidence. Third, the breathless “this indictment legally does not exist” line is pure rhetorical theatre. Grand jury procedural challenges happen all the time in every administration. They’re handled by judges, not bloggers writing with 200-point fonts. If a procedural flaw existed, a court would deal with it — not Ty Cobb on TV. Fourth, the leap from “I disagree with their handling” to “DISBAR THEM!” is exactly the kind of hysterical escalation that has polluted political discourse for the last decade. Disbarment is not a toy. It requires intentional misconduct, not Twitter outrage or MSNBC panel theatrics. Fifth, framing career attorneys as “bargain-basement MAGA influencers” is just childish name-calling. Pam Bondi served multiple terms as Florida AG. Lindsey Halligan has argued federal cases and handled major litigation. You may not like them, but pretending they're TikTok randos is unserious. Finally, the idea that this is the catastrophic collapse of the “rule of law” is rich coming from a network that spent years justifying politically motivated investigations, leaks, and unprecedented legal theories when it suited their side. If people want to have a real conversation about protecting the legal system, then it has to apply equally — not only when it’s politically convenient. In short: Dial down the theatrics, let the courts handle the law, and stop treating MSNBC monologues like gospel truth.

To: Mongo2116 who wrote (1572640)	11/20/2025 9:46:07 AM
From: Bonefish	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579757

For those that think the USA under trump is a dictatorship. It's not. youtube.com