The problem with your posts, IC720, is that every topic—Armstrong, CIA, chemtrails, Building 7, poisoned food, “killed inventors,” COVID—gets thrown into the same blender and treated as one giant singular plot. When everything is a conspiracy, nothing is ever evaluated honestly.
And let’s be blunt:
Armstrong publishing 80–100 essays claiming he was innocent doesn’t prove innocence. Every convicted fraudster in history has written essays defending themselves.
If he had unquestionable evidence, he wouldn’t have spent years in prison. He’d have walked out the front door, not been dragged through contempt citations.
If the man with “True AI,” who claims to predict everything down to the day, couldn’t foresee his own indictment, prosecution, or imprisonment, that should tell you something.
You can’t hold him up as some infallible oracle while simultaneously excusing the very real legal consequences he faced.
On Your List of ‘The Enemy Within’ You’re chaining together:- world protests
- the CIA
- USAID
- food poisoning
- climate agendas
- murdered inventors
- fires
- Building 7
- chemtrails
- 25 million dead from vaccines
- 300 firefighters “murdered”
as if this is all one continuous plot executed flawlessly for decades by the same unified mastermind.
That isn’t analysis.
It’s pattern-seeking without evidence, and it’s exactly why conspiracies become unfalsifiable: everything becomes “proof.”
You keep asking, “What happens when the truth comes out?”
But this is the same line that was used for JFK, MK-Ultra, fluoride, Y2K, the Mayan calendar, Jade Helm, Q, and half a dozen others—none of which delivered the “big reveal.”
Building 7
The “50% of architects don’t know about Building 7” line comes from activism groups, not peer-reviewed structural engineering. And even then—knowing about it doesn’t mean agreeing with the controlled-demolition narrative.
Most people “knew” about it within a week because it was on television constantly. You and I knew about it.
That does not prove an inside job—only that news coverage existed.
“Chemtrails got to you?”
This is another perfect example of how your logic works:
Anyone who doesn’t buy every part of the theory must be:- brainwashed
- poisoned
- asleep
- groomed
There’s no room for a middle ground or for the possibility that some claims are true, some are exaggerated, and some are flat-out wrong.
That’s not critical thinking. That’s ideological gravity: everything gets pulled inward until it all orbits the same belief cluster.
“Did the USA allow or cause 3000 murdered, 300k maimed…”
You’re asking the question backward.
A government covering up mistakes is plausible.
A government executing a flawless, decades-long, multi-agency mass-murder plot without a single internal whistleblower, defector, or leak is not.
People leak classified information about everything—affairs, budgets, troop positions, UFO sightings, political gossip, tech failures.
Yet somehow the only perfect conspiracy in human history is the one involving thousands of people across dozens of agencies who left no trace?
Even the CIA couldn’t keep MK-Ultra secret.
Yet you believe they flawlessly orchestrated 9/11, chemtrails, vaccines, food sabotage, fire conspiracies, and the deaths of unknown inventors—all with zero paper trail.
At some point, the theory becomes so large it collapses under its own weight.
Bottom Line Believing the world has corruption, propaganda, coverups, and incompetence is rational.
Believing that every global event—economic, political, scientific, and natural—is part of a single, coordinated, multi-generational master plan is not.
You haven’t uncovered a hidden truth.
You’ve stitched unrelated events together and called the quilt a conspiracy. |
