Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IC720 who wrote (1573853)	11/27/2025 8:50:50 AM
From: IC720	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579397

The Global Debt Ponzi Scheme explained. The United States owes 38 trillion, Japan owes 9 trillion, etc. All countries combined owe 350 trillion. Who is owed? It is the biggest hoax of all. But every President and head of state worldwide plays along. That should tell you… pic.twitter.com/k4EfHwPOg1 — Victor Scott (@VictorFromDE) November 24, 2025

To: IC720 who wrote (1573853)	11/27/2025 9:41:53 AM
From: Maple MAGA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579397

This is exactly the kind of fear-mongering that Armstrong built his entire brand on — endless predictions of imminent collapse, always just far enough in the future that nobody can check him in the moment. He strings together worst-case hypotheticals, presents them as certainties, and then mixes in unverifiable claims about “meetings,” “peace plans,” and “computers going flatline” as if those are hard evidence. They aren’t. They’re part of the performance. A few things need to be said plainly: 1. Nothing in your quoted text is sourced, verified, or even internally consistent. Every paragraph jumps from assumption to assumption — “NATO wants to conquer Russia,” “Russia’s about to use nukes,” “China told Kallas to her face,” “the West is walking a fine line,” “the computer says Ukraine is finished.” None of these claims are corroborated by anything in the real world. 2. Nuclear war is not “imminent,” and no serious analyst is claiming it is. Yes, the risk exists — it always exists between nuclear powers. But the idea that NATO is actively trying to provoke a nuclear exchange is fantasy-level geopolitics. That is the opposite of how NATO, the EU, or Washington operate. 3. Armstrong’s “computer” is not a geopolitical authority — it’s a prop. Every time he needs to make a bold prediction, suddenly the “computer” told him. Every time he’s wrong, suddenly “they” sabotaged events or ignored his warnings. It’s unfalsifiable by design. 4. His obsession with Zelensky, Kallas, and NATO isn’t analysis — it’s scapegoating. He needs villains so his predictions can always rely on shadowy forces, neocons, conspiracies, coups, and betrayals. It’s the same script every time. 5. The “DO NOT TRAVEL TO EUROPE POST-APRIL 2026” claim is pure doomsday sensationalism. No governments are issuing such warnings. No intelligence agencies are saying this. No credible think tank is saying Europe will be unsafe for travel in 2026. This is Armstrong manufacturing drama to keep people hooked. 6. He speaks as if he’s personally negotiating global peace accords. He isn’t. There is zero evidence he drafted peace plans for heads of state. There is zero evidence Kallas or Zelensky have ever even acknowledged his existence. 7. None of his historical predictions have come true as he claims. He retrofits timelines after the fact and relies on followers not checking the record. Bottom line: This “analysis” is not geopolitical insight. It’s fear packaged as prophecy, designed to make the audience dependent on Armstrong’s worldview — a worldview that always places him at the center of history, fighting imaginary battles with global elites. If someone wants to believe that NATO, the EU, Russia, China, Zelensky, Kallas, and half the planet are all actors in a drama only Martin Armstrong truly understands, fine — but that’s not geopolitics. That’s Armstrong fan-fiction. Europe isn’t closing in 2026. NATO isn’t planning to invade Russia. And Armstrong doesn’t have a crystal ball — or a magic computer — that sees the future.

To: IC720 who wrote (1573853)	11/27/2025 9:48:26 AM
From: Maple MAGA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579397

Can't you see what a carnival sideshow Armstrong is...? Are you that blind...? Martin Armstrong author of the Economic Confidence Model based on an 8.6 year business cycle theory inspired by the work of Nikolai Kondratieff. Martin A. Armstrong is currently serving a five year sentence at Fort Dix Camp in New Jersey. He continues his economic and financial writings from prison and hand draws many of the covers of the reports. Wikipedia on Kontradiev: Nikolai Dmitriyevich Kondratiev (4 March 1892 – 17 September 1938) was a Russian economist, who was a proponent of the New Economic Policy (NEP) in the Soviet Union. He was executed at the height of Stalin’s Great Purge.