Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tweets Boar Hog who wrote (97301)	12/8/2025 3:33:22 PM
From: Tweets Boar Hog	3 Recommendations Recommended By ajtj99 Arran Yuan towerdog Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97551

MSTR Wave Count. Lot of fascination with Bitcoin continues, and still plenty of bulls. I like to do alternative wave counts against the bullish norm, awa with respect to the cycles. If Mstr drops below ~ 130 the odds of this wave count being correct increase dramatically. Anyone who messes with wave counts realizes that alternatives are a good thing to do. This one was very confusing, for me anyway, until more recently. Things just did not add up. Maybe more clarity now ... we C how it moves forward. I just did not think of B wave possibility until a month or so ago. I track these, sometimes for a long time, if they come to fruition, I head in. Hope to live this one out, it could turn into a real Monster. Tweets From the 2000 X top we have a 5 waver down, obvious. From there it gets more tricky. From the 2002 bottom to the 2015 (a) top we have a triangle for a 3. From that (a) top to the 2020 bottom we have another triangle for another 3. From that 2020 bottom we have another abc for another 3. So far then we have a 5(333)? which reduces to a 53? pattern. It seems possible then we are gonna end up with a 535, for a big complex ABC pattern. There is nothing really unusual about this, just a long long B wave, time wise. There is something else I have noticed over the years, is that when a big singular move occurs like that in the 1999 to 2000 time, the ensuing correction is often long and complex. The C in process, if that is what it is, will not make a new low. But the TL should break, and it could easily go into low single digits. So now the hunt is on, eh?