SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bonefish who wrote (1575617)12/7/2025 10:36:03 AM
From: Mongo21164 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
Goose94
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1583406
 



To: Bonefish who wrote (1575617)12/7/2025 3:12:39 PM
From: zax6 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
Goose94
pocotrader
ralfph
Tenchusatsu

and 1 more member

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583406
 
You'd have to be a complete idiot to buy into any of the nonsense coming from the Trump admin on these war crimes.

Before anyone talks about “bombing fishing boats” or “stopping fentanyl from Venezuela,” here are the actual facts:

* Distance:
The closest point between Venezuela and the United States is 1,073 miles.
That’s over a thousand miles of open ocean.

* Fishing boats:
A typical fishing boat would need 6–12 full tanks of fuel to even attempt that trip.
It’s not a realistic trafficking route — it’s not even physically practical.

* How much fentanyl comes from Venezuela?
Virtually none.
Venezuela is not a source country for fentanyl going into the United States.


* Where U.S. fentanyl actually comes from:
- China supplies most of the precursor chemicals
- Mexico manufactures the illicit fentanyl
- Fentanyl enters mostly through ports of entry by land, hidden in vehicles — not fishing boats

So the idea that Venezuelan fishing boats are flooding the U.S. with fentanyl is not just wrong — it’s physically impossible.

If we want to solve the fentanyl crisis, we have to start with facts, not myths.




To: Bonefish who wrote (1575617)12/7/2025 3:27:48 PM
From: zax5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Eric
Goose94
pocotrader
rdkflorida2
Tenchusatsu

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583406
 
BREAKING: Yes, this was a WAR CRIME.

Admiral Bradley just told lawmakers that the survivors on that boat were waving at something in the air, likely signaling for help or attempting to surrender. Moments later, a second missile struck, killing them.

And here’s what Fox won’t tell you: the boat was heading EAST, away from the United States, toward Suriname.

Hegseth must be impeached immediately.




To: Bonefish who wrote (1575617)12/8/2025 1:58:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Goose94
pocotrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583406
 
Thronefish,
More likely a hand off
Then it makes too much sense to go after the bigger vessel that the "fishing boat" was headed toward.

Unfortunately that would violate too many laws of maritime trade.

So instead, Peacock Pete just kills people that he can get away with.

Works great until it doesn't.

Tenchusatsu