SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (356990)12/11/2025 12:40:31 PM
From: Steve Lokness2 Recommendations

Recommended By
John Koligman
Sam

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 357267
 
<<<It is difficult to see how we can improve this situation by getting involved.>>>>

hey, it was your guy who promised to end the war on day one. ........Now you suggest we let it play out?



To: i-node who wrote (356990)12/12/2025 8:57:32 AM
From: Alighieri5 Recommendations

Recommended By
CentralParkRanger
John Koligman
Mannie
Steve Lokness
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 357267
 
In this case, Trump is "letting it cook" for a while with the hope Zelensky will slowly come to terms with his situation and realize he needs to settle with Putin. In the meanwhile, the war of attrition is biting at Russia and significantly weakens it without USA playing a substantial role.

It is difficult to see how we can improve this situation by getting involved. Let these two exhaust themselves. I cannot think of happier thoughts than a depleted Russia.

Trump, like the rest of us, remembers Russia's blunder of taking on Afghanistan.

Sun Tsu: "Supreme excellence is breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting".


Hard to know where to start on this mess of a post.

First you suggest that Trump's "strategy" is clever, because it basically consists of hoping that Zelensky settle with Russia, meaning cede territory, presumably on the assumption that it's good enough for Putin, ignoring the fact that this criminal has been carrying out decades of violent territorial grabbing toward its former USSR satellites. Can you see the road ahead here? Can you think back to Europe 1930s as a distinct possibility?

Then you support your argument by example with the Russian defeat in Afghanistan, when American weapon support for the resistance there was instrumental in that defeat and soon thereafter led to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Incongruous, contradictory logic.

I understand...it's a tough job defending incompetence and corruption...but don't quit...you demonstrate to the rest of us a good example of the right's dangerous ignorance.

Al