To: IC720 who wrote (1577214 ) 12/15/2025 9:35:51 AM From: Maple MAGA Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578036 Once again you’re bundling a lot of unrelated claims together and calling it “connection,” but that’s not evidence, it’s pattern-matching. When everything is assumed to be coordinated, any disagreement becomes “proof,” which makes the theory unfalsifiable. A few points: • Public belief isn’t evidence. At various times majorities believed the sun orbited the Earth, cigarettes were healthy, and Iraq had WMDs. Truth isn’t decided by polls. • “Controlled MSM/universities/entertainment” is asserted, not demonstrated. These institutions regularly disagree with each other, compete, and expose one another — which is the opposite of centralized control. • 9/11 had intelligence failures and incompetence, yes — but that’s very different from “allowed mass murder” or proof of a unified hidden hand behind everything since. • Climate policy can be debated, but calling it a “95% scam” ignores decades of independent measurement across countries, universities, militaries, and private firms that don’t answer to one authority. • NASA being “controlled by Hitler scientists” collapses once you look at timelines, personnel turnover, international participation, and open technical documentation. • Labeling Putin as a long-term authoritarian ruler and Trump as legally embattled are conclusions drawn from documented actions, courts, elections, and laws, not propaganda symmetry. When every major event, leader, institution, and crisis is assumed to share the same secret agenda, the theory becomes immune to facts and corrections. That’s not “common sense”; it’s starting with the conclusion and working backwards. Skepticism is healthy. Treating complexity, incompetence, and conflicting incentives as a single hidden master plan is not.