Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (1577883)	12/17/2025 9:04:49 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578933

An example is such analyses tend to ignore the fact that NY and CA charge massive state income taxes, which are then deductible on the federal tax return. So? Are you trying to claim that because they could pay higher federal taxes, that means they are subsidized somehow? Like I have posted before, for a CPA you play fast and loose with your "perfect" numbers.

To: i-node who wrote (1577883)	12/17/2025 12:00:13 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578933

Inode, An example is such analyses tend to ignore the fact that NY and CA charge massive state income taxes, which are then deductible on the federal tax return. But property in those states is massively more expensive than it is in TX or Arkansas, so taxapyers in Cali get far more federal deductions simply because your states are less affordable. How's that my problem? As a CPA guy, you of all people should have known that those deductions are currently capped at $10K ($5K for individual filers). But hey, I love watching you squirm when faced with the facts. The only way to deal with MAGA is with the facts. Tenchusatsu