SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Conservatives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Saulamanca who wrote (124996)12/17/2025 10:32:40 PM
From: Saulamanca  Respond to of 125057
 
FYI: Brown University was among 150 U.S. colleges and universities that received a letter from the digital rights advocacy group 'Fight for the Future' in August 2025 urging them to disable their CCTV systems to protect student anonymity amid concerns over the Trump administration's alleged "fascism."


Human Rights Groups to University Administrators: Dismantle Surveillance to Defend Free Speech Now (Open Letter)

Dear university administrators and trustees,

We are human rights organizations writing to express concerns about campus surveillance tools and policies that have the potential to fuel attacks on free expression and academic freedom across the country. Since January 2025, the Trump administration has launched an aggressive campaign against US academic institutions, revoking international students’ visas and threatening universities with funding cuts unless they agree to suppress speech on campus. The president of Princeton University has described this assault as “the greatest threat to American universities since the Red Scare of the 1950s.” As university leaders take steps to defend their communities, it is imperative that data minimization, data privacy, and the dismantling of harmful surveillance systems are prioritized alongside other protective measures. Without immediate action, surveillance tools and the data they amass will be used to supercharge the virulent attacks on campus communities.

Protest, free speech, academic freedom, and press freedom are indispensable in democracies, and are even more important as fascism looms. University campuses must be spaces where people feel safe to speak truth to power, express dissenting opinions, report freely on campus issues, and organize for social change.

For years, researchers and tech experts have warned about the ways surveillance technologies are fundamentally at odds with the principles of freedom of expression, and democracy broadly. Right now these tools are facilitating the identification and punishment of student protesters, undermining activists’ right to anonymity––a right the Supreme Court has affirmed as vital to free expression and political participation. They are also being used to monitor students’ online activity, forcing students to self-censor and contributing to a broader chilling effect on online speech and journalism.

Beyond stifling free expression, surveillance technologies are often deeply flawed and biased. They disproportionately misidentify people of color, women, children, nonbinary individuals, and people with disabilities—errors that can lead to wrongful disciplinary actions and false arrests. Far from making campuses safer, these tools can bring about serious harm, potentially with life-altering consequences.

Now, in the face of Trump’s attacks on U.S. universities, the stakes of invasive tracking of students have never been higher. The troves of data amassed through surveillance tools can be accessed by agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to track, intimidate, and disappear campus community members who have engaged in constitutionally protected speech. These attacks are part and parcel of the administration’s broader campaign to criminalize immigrants and the expression of dissent––a campaign enabled by nationwide surveillance infrastructure.

As university administrators, you have the responsibility to safeguard your campus community and uphold the constitutional rights and fundamental freedoms of students, faculty, and staff––especially in the face of the anti-rights campaign led by the Trump administration. To stand against these threats, we urge you to adopt the following practices:

  • Refuse to cooperate or share data with law enforcement agencies: Refuse to cooperate with local, state, and federal lawmakers, law enforcement agents, and immigration authorities seeking to surveil, detain, and deport students, faculty, or staff. This includes prohibiting university staff from voluntarily sharing campus community members’ personal data with law enforcement, especially data that can aid in the targeting of activists, like immigration status and records of disciplinary actions. This also includes discontinuing any default data sharing agreements with campus police and local police departments.
  • Secure data with end-to-end encryption: Secure student, faculty, and staff data with the highest levels of protection, including end-to-end encryption. Mandate training for university staff on data security practices.
  • Delete sensitive data: Purge any data collected on students, staff, and faculty that is not essential to the functioning of the university––including data that can be used to fuel the targeting of protesters, immigrants, journalists, and other vulnerable groups. Delete video footage and photos of campus protesters acquired through surveillance cameras and ID swipe records that identify student and staff movements across campus.
  • Dismantle surveillance: Discontinue the use of invasive technologies that collect sensitive data. This includes tools and practices such as ID swipe tracking, social media monitoring, facial recognition tools, license plate readers, motion and heat sensors, WiFi vendors that collect people’s location data, and biometric online exam proctoring programs. The data amassed by these tools may be weaponized by local, state, and federal agencies to target activists, immigrants, journalists, and other vulnerable groups on campus.
  • Reject mask restriction policies: Mask restrictions fundamentally threaten free speech and increase the criminalization of protestors. These policies also jeopardize the safety of the entire campus community by exposing people to the ongoing threats of COVID, Long COVID, and other public health issues. Universities must oppose proposed restrictions on masking, and retain COVID safety policies that allow students to remain masked.
  • Harm reduction related to doxxing: Provide campus community members with information about data deletion services (i.e. services that remove personal data and other information from data broker databases) and educational resources that allow students, staff, and faculty to proactively protect themselves against doxxing. Also provide tools and services to mitigate harm once doxxing occurs.
Universities must adopt these measures as the baseline for preventing the weaponization of their communities’ data. Universities should also make every possible effort to engage with students, faculty, and staff on enacting broader campus safety measures and demands. This could include the establishment of clear policies delineating how community members are expected to respond to ICE presence on campus, as well as the implementation of strong protections for journalists’ reporting on rights infringements against student/faculty protestors and other vulnerable groups (whether by ICE, administrators, or other actors). It could also include the introduction of secure and privacy-preserving remote learning/teaching options that allow faculty and students to stay at home to protect themselves, among other common sense measures.

Campus surveillance and invasive data collection directly serve the forces seeking to suppress speech and erode the spaces universities provide for political exchange and critical thought. You have the power to resist these threats. In doing so, data minimization, data security, and the dismantling of harmful surveillance systems must take on a central focus. Defending privacy is not only essential for fostering trust within your community, but also for upholding the university’s fundamental role and responsibility to protect free expression and academic freedom––two key pillars of our democracy.

Signed,

18 Million Rising
Access Now
Advocacy for Principled Action in Government
American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC)
American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)
Amnesty International USA
Center for Constitutional Rights
Center for Security, Race and Rights
Center on Resilience and Digital Justice
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)
COVID Safe Campus
Defending Rights & Dissent
Demand Progress
Dissenters
Eko
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
Fight for the Future
Free Press
Freedom of the Press Foundation
Kairos
MPower Change
MPower Change Action Fund
Muslim Advocates
Muslim Justice League
New America’s Open Technology Institute
Palestine Legal
Repro Uncensored
Restore The Fourth
Secure Justice
Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (STOP)
Tech for Palestine
X-Lab


fightforthefuture.org



To: Saulamanca who wrote (124996)12/18/2025 10:26:40 AM
From: Bill1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Saulamanca

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 125057
 
Brown University Hires Chief Wiggum To Track Down Shooter

CRIME·Dec 17, 2025 · BabylonBee.com



PROVIDENCE, RI — Leadership at Brown University, frustrated with the lack of progress in tracking the shooter who killed two students and injured many more on December 13, has reportedly recruited Police Chief Clancy Wiggum of Springfield to assist in the case.

"Two deaths and nine injuries — sounds like the work of rowdy teens!" Wiggum said in a press conference as he laid out his progress on the case. "I talked with the FBI profiler, and she said it was some lone nut, but that's nuts."

Chief Wiggum has been busy since arriving in Rhode Island just days ago. He's revisited the crime scene and traced the FBI's steps to check for anything they may have missed. He even re-examined the seemingly random patch of snow federal agents were famously photographed inspecting. "Snow is a blank canvas for crime, but like all modern art, it has to be interpreted," Wiggum said. "Unfortunately, the FBI has some terrible art critics. They wouldn't know a Picasso from a footprint."

To ensure no stone was left unturned, Wiggum ordered all snow in the vicinity of the university bagged for evidence. Sergeant Lou and Officer Eddie were brought in from Springfield to assist in sifting through it to rule out the involvement of any magical snowmen.

"Nobody suspects the snowman," Wiggum said, "They say he's got a jolly soul, but deep down he's got an ice-cold heart. Isn't that right, Lou?"

At publishing time, sources confirmed Chief Wiggum successfully tracked down an individual linked to the shooting. "Bake him away, toys!" he ordered his officers.



To: Saulamanca who wrote (124996)12/18/2025 12:05:17 PM
From: golfer72  Respond to of 125057
 
Anything that cant be immediately blamed on Trump goes into "investigation" . Thats when you know we will never really know who is responsible