SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (357559)12/18/2025 10:10:09 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 358054
 
Cornell’s Hiring and Retention Practices Prioritize Identity Over Merit

Cornell’s institutional policies openly promote identity-based hiring preferences. These practices are not accidental—they are officially sanctioned and operationalized throughout the university.

Internal Records Reveal a Covert Discriminatory Hiring Scheme

Documents provided to AFPI detail a deliberate scheme within at least one Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) academic department to exclude potential tenure-track faculty candidates based on race and sex. This process was devised and executed in close coordination with senior DEI officials and the Office of the Provost, then led by President Kotlikoff.

The evidence includes:
  • A December 23, 2020, email message from a department chair confirming that the tenure track faculty position in question would be filled through a “diversity hire” process that excluded the great majority of qualified candidates because these persons lacked the targeted identity traits. Candidates were prescreened and selected, then invited one at a time, in a secret process with no advertised position opening to avoid any sense of competition on the part of the prospective candidates. Only individuals with certain favored identity characteristics (race, ethnicity, and/or sex) were considered for employment. (See Exhibit A)
  • A report that a list of 20–30 preselected candidates, compiled purely based on identity screening, was used to guide the process. The scheme called for candidates to be approached sequentially until one accepted the offer. It is estimated that more than 98% of otherwise qualified applicants were excluded from employment consideration based on their disfavored identity characteristics, without these persons ever knowing an open Cornell faculty position existed.
  • Reports of internal meetings in which faculty were discouraged from evaluating candidates on merit. When concerns were raised about the credentials of proposed hires, the Cornell faculty members who questioned the “diversity hire” process were dismissed as “racist,” and no further objections were tolerated.
  • A December 13, 2022, email message discussing another assistant professor search within a STEM academic department states that the department first prescreened candidates solely based on their required diversity statements, eliminating one candidate immediately due to a “weak” DEI narrative. The same email message confirms that more experienced candidates were excluded for “reasons of equity,” regardless of more favorable qualifications.

These practices violate not only the law but also the most basic principles of academic integrity and fairness. They also directly contradict President Kotlikoff’s claims that merit governs Cornell’s hiring decisions.

americafirstpolicy.com

Tom