Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bull_dozer who wrote (1578986)	12/22/2025 2:00:02 PM
From: Maple MAGA	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo longz Respond to of 1579772

Many people believe that Epstein’s activities intersected with U.S. intelligence because the type of information he appeared to possess would not be ordinary criminal evidence, but material that governments typically classify as state secrets. Epstein moved freely among heads of state, intelligence-connected financiers, defense contractors, royalty, and senior politicians across multiple countries. The value of his operation was not simply money or sex crimes, but leverage, specifically, kompromat. Information gathered through blackmail, sexual entrapment, or covert influence operations is exactly the kind of material intelligence agencies protect, compartmentalize, and classify. If Epstein was acting, formally or informally, as an asset, cut-out, or tolerated operator, then the most sensitive information people are demanding (client lists, recordings, names, foreign links, financial channels) would fall under national-security classification. That would explain why: - Evidence remains sealed or “missing” - Investigations stall or quietly narrow - No comprehensive disclosure has occurred despite intense public pressure - Accountability appears selectively enforced - Intelligence agencies do not publicly expose assets, methods, or compromised elites because doing so would reveal: - Active or past intelligence operations - Foreign intelligence entanglements - Systemic elite vulnerability to coercion - Failures or complicity at senior institutional levels In short, the reason the public keeps hitting a wall is likely not incompetence, but classification. If Epstein intersected with intelligence services, then the truth people want is not merely criminal, it is political, diplomatic, and strategic. And that kind of information is not released voluntarily, regardless of public outrage. Whether one agrees with this interpretation or not, it provides a far more coherent explanation than the idea that one of the most well-connected criminals in modern history simply operated unchecked by accident.