Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Young and Older Folk Portfolio -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: QTI on SI who wrote (23916)	12/24/2025 5:37:47 AM
From: cemanuel	25 Recommendations Recommended By Balancedinvestor bootss@cat chap107 chowder Chowderfan and 20 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24041

RE: I’ll dial it back and avoid overwhelming the board with further DSM or project-related posts. I like 'em myself. These have a great deal of investing value IMO. They go into a lot of detail why the model does or doesn't recommend something. Nice to dig into and explore the reasoning. I see them with a lot of value if someone finds the model fits with their investing style/perspective and may be something they find useful. Scrolling past something I don't want to read is one of the simpler things to do in life. I haven't figured out why people don't do this rather than trying to restrict what others talk about. I have zero CEFs and no intention of buying any but I don't send private messages to people telling them they're talking too much about them. Then again, I have a problem anytime anyone wants to restrict discussion. IMO that's up to Chowder. He's the moderator. We don't need a bunch of self-imposed ones who want to regulate what we should talk about. (longer rant deleted)

To: QTI on SI who wrote (23916)	12/24/2025 7:09:48 AM
From: Haz21	5 Recommendations Recommended By Balancedinvestor chowder Markbn QTI on SI suncoaster Respond to of 24041

It was privately brought to my attention that I may have been dominating the board with my recent posts, primarily around DSM-related content. QTI. I appreciate the work you've put in on DSM. I probably haven't read all the posts in enough detail to fully understand the content- I tend to skim to the bottom for the answer :). Andy

To: QTI on SI who wrote (23916)	12/24/2025 8:32:40 AM
From: R.Daneel.Olivaw	17 Recommendations Recommended By Balancedinvestor cemanuel chap107 chowder Chowderfan and 12 more members Respond to of 24041

re: I’ll dial it back and avoid overwhelming the board with further DSM or project-related posts. I don't post much but if the moderator didn't suggest it, I find it offensive. It is very easy to skip over posts if one doesn't want to read them. Speaking of your posts specifically, I read some, skimmed some, and ignored some. They are investing related with actionable information, with an explanation of the process. It can help people here and I suspect helps you to do it and explain. Share Away! Beats most of the Crap [my favorite word] I see around the investing web! Of course, if the moderator said something... 'Never Mind.'

To: QTI on SI who wrote (23916)	12/24/2025 9:36:13 AM
From: DoctorRicky	24 Recommendations Recommended By Balancedinvestor cemanuel chap107 chowder dan1944 and 19 more members Respond to of 24041

QTI - Ignore the private reply about too much posting. I am very intrigued by your new model and will be making some portfolio adjustments incorporating suggestions from your model. I will start with a few nibbles and monitor what happens. I abhor comments such as “you are doing too much” or “you are taking up too much space.” If we aren’t interested in any comment we can simply scroll on by. I do that when things get too political. It’s my job to monitor my own satisfaction. I am also intrigued by the refinements in your model - this is how creativity works - creating and editing.

To: QTI on SI who wrote (23916)	12/24/2025 12:07:54 PM
From: Markbn	20 Recommendations Recommended By Balancedinvestor cemanuel chap107 chowder Chowderfan and 15 more members Respond to of 24041

*RE: I’ll dial it back and avoid overwhelming the board with further DSM or project-related posts.* In my opinion, please do not "dial it back". It is quite simple to move on to the next post if one is not interested in any specific post. I find the information most interesting, and while I am still getting used to it, I can see the potential value it has in making investing decisions.

To: QTI on SI who wrote (23916)	12/24/2025 12:47:53 PM
From: ALinVA	6 Recommendations Recommended By cemanuel chowder livwell Lucia QTI on SI and 1 more member Respond to of 24041

As others stated, Please do not dial back. Unless it's from Chowder, ignore it, as others have stated what you're doing is valuable. It's easy to skip what one doesn't want to read.

To: QTI on SI who wrote (23916)	12/24/2025 1:02:16 PM
From: macbolan	1 Recommendation Recommended By chowder Respond to of 24041

I for one did not find your posts dominating, I found them interesting and it was fun seeing the evolution of a new feature. But I get that others may like a dial back. Great work!! Thanks for sharing it with us.