To: Harshu Vyas who wrote (78856 ) 1/4/2026 6:13:55 AM From: petal 1 RecommendationRecommended By Spekulatius
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 79163 PYPL. I do agree that it's not a Google or a Meta. (PS. Remember when Google traded at P/E 15 a few years ago, and Meta at P/E sub-10? :D) It's perhaps not a great business, but it's a good business (I think). I would probably call it a great business rather than a poor business. (Right now, anyway, and historically – it's always tricky to predict the future!) Maybe they are followers, rather than leaders. But you don't have to be the bleeding-edge guy; take DELL for example, they have made a pretty good business, but their computers aren't exactly a Mac... (Maybe that's not their Dell's fault, though – maybe it's just the Windows software that makes all non-Mac computers subpar. By the way, MSFT hav also carved out a pretty good business, haven't they, although they've copied or bought everything, and invented nothing themselves. I admire a Google or an Apple more – but it's difficult to say that Microsoft isn't as good a company.) Good point about V/MA/AXP being the infrastructure layer! But don't you think that there is another layer on top of that, owned by Stripe, Adyen, etcetera – and maybe PayPal? it's just complex and not easy to hold. I disagree – it would seem to me it's a rather simple business – but maybe I don't know enough! They mostly just take a cut from all payments that are made through their platform, no? Like a modern day toll booth. The technology is probably quite complex (and here I would think that they have a moat), and the technology landscape is too (and fast-changing, sometimes). But as long as they can navigate the treacherous waters of everyday business battle, thy should be alright, it seems to me!