SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : QUANTUM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MKL who wrote (7406)2/26/1998 1:29:00 PM
From: Frodo Baxter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9124
 
>They are typically depreciated over 7 years with very low risk... Most of these equipment have to be replace (converted) anyway when product changes! Current DD product cycle is less than 2 years.

Wow, I thought depreciation schedules were secret. Where do you get these numbers?

>So, equipment breakdown is not a major issue.

If you followed my silly exercise in this and the other thread, you know (or should have guessed) that I wasn't really saying that the machines that the food chain folks buy break down. Instead, they are no longer able to produce a product that their customers would pay for (i.e. they are no longer able to print money).



To: MKL who wrote (7406)2/26/1998 11:07:00 PM
From: Stitch  Respond to of 9124
 
MKL,

The specialized test equipment (non scope, and other generalized stuff) you refer to in your post is typically amortized over 5 years. The demands on these systems do change more rapidly but most suppliers , who also race the technical curve, have been able to provide upgrade paths. These upgrades are not cheap however, sometime requiring replacement of entire read/write channel, or positioning system, or other major suub assy of the system. Upgrades that I know have have approximated 70% of the original system cost. The amortization schedule, in my opinion, is frequently not aggressive enough but I have no guesses how much this affects the book.

Best,
Stitch