SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Mullens who wrote (197255)1/18/2026 12:46:55 PM
From: waitwatchwander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197452
 
I don't get it but I trust and expect Qualcomm to get it.

I guess the worse case is we're back at square one with an altogether new case. If the game is delay until all becomes irrelevant, some may see Arm winning.

A short delay doesn't matter but these cases being dragged out at infinitum are certainly not in Qualcomm's interest. Isn't this how the unfair Apple settlement came about?

The wonderful world of lawyering, all poker with a sprinkling of fact.



To: Jim Mullens who wrote (197255)1/19/2026 5:02:48 PM
From: Silcon Observer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197452
 
Jim,

Thanks for the post.

Is there a link to this fact (Arm's claim of QC suing wrong company)? Google search didn't turn up anythig?

A link (e.g. court records) would be highly appreciated.

TIA



To: Jim Mullens who wrote (197255)1/19/2026 9:43:04 PM
From: JGoren2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Jim Mullens
John Hayman

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197452
 
One of the first questions asked in discovery is usually whether the correct entity has been sued. Also at this late date it is too late to amend the pleading and a surprise.