To: combjelly who wrote (1583940 ) 1/18/2026 3:56:13 PM From: Maple MAGA 2 RecommendationsRecommended By
Read Replies (1) | Respond to What’s wrong with your post isn’t just tone, it’s fundamental misunderstanding of infectious-disease control , wrapped in an aggressive style that guarantees rejection. False equivalence (Native Americans analogy)Native Americans encountering Europeans is inaccurate and inflammatory. Indigenous populations had no prior exposure or immunity , no vaccines, no antibiotics, and no public-health infrastructure. Modern populations do have immune memory, vaccines, surveillance, and outbreak control. The analogy exaggerates risk and undermines credibility. Problem :Incorrect claim about eradication vs vaccination “Once it is eradicated globally, like smallpox, then you stop vaccinating.” Smallpox vaccination stopped after eradication , not before. Measles is not eradicated globally , so stopping vaccination would cause resurgence, not prevent it. Herd immunity depends on continued vaccination as long as the virus circulates anywhere. Problem :Misuse of “pandemic” Measles is highly contagious but well understood, surveilled, and controllable . Outbreaks occur due to local immunity gaps , not because vaccination continues. Calling this a “pandemic setup” is medically inaccurate. Problem :Straw-man framing (“go all North Korea”) Total border closure or Catastrophic disease vulnerability Targeted vaccination Travel screening Rapid outbreak response Booster campaigns Problem :Condescending and ad hominem tone “That you don't understand this simple and very obvious fact explains a lot…” Attacks the person, not the argument Signals ideology rather than confidence Ensures the reader stops listening—even if you were right Problem :Internal contradiction Humans move freely Therefore vaccination is dangerous But also claims eradication requires not vaccinating first , cessation last ).Problem :
