SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (219733)1/26/2026 6:14:35 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219867
 
Btw

zerohedge.com

Plaza Accord II? After The Coordinated Global Yen Intervention, What Happens Next

BY TYLER DURDEN

MONDAY, JAN 26, 2026 - 04:45 AM

Just after noon on Friday, while many in the investing world were still scratching their heads in puzzled frustration over the sharp move higher in the yen, we were first to explain that the sharp move was the result of something the US had not done since the Fukushima disaster in 2011: per market rumors first publicized by Spectra Markets, in response to a request by the Japanese Ministry of Finance (which in turn was conveying Bank of Japan instructions), the US Treasury asked the NY Fed to conduct a rate check (traditionally a harbinger of imminent central bank intervention in a given currency) for the USDJPY, a highly unusual move which is "USD bearish" (and yes, for those confused, the chain of communication was BOJ -> MOF -> US Treasury - NY Fed).

For a more detailed timeline of what happened, below we share notes from Spectra's Brent Donnelly, who was first to bring attention to this historic rate check.

  1. BOJ meeting was neutral, no major reaction.
  2. Massive sloppy sell off 159.20 to 157.37 shortly after. Speculation was it was an asset manager (not intervention), but nobody knows. Then it bounced to 158.50 and was steady until the Fed came in and asked banks for rates in USDJPY just after 11 a.m. They were likely waiting for the liquidity to dry up (11:00 am is peak liquidity in FX) to achieve maximum impact.
  3. A lot of confusion as to what was going on, but it eventually became clear that the Fed did a rate check and this was public information that banks were allowed to share.
  4. USDJPY cratered and closed at 155.80.
Hours after ZH, the WSJ chimed in, writing that the rate check was a clear signal by US and Japanese authorities "that they are prepared to step in to arrest a slide in the yen, prompting the dollar’s biggest one-day percentage drop against the Japanese currency since August."

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reached out to potential trading counterparties at the direction of the Treasury Department on Friday for so-called rate checks, according to people familiar with the matter—that is, inquiries about the pricing available if it intervened in currency markets by trading dollars and yen.

The New York Fed carries out financial transactions on the Treasury’s behalf. A rate check is typically a signal that authorities are concerned about how a particular currency is trading, and can precede a direct intervention.

By end of trading on Friday, the dollar fell 1.7% against the yen Friday, with the drop accelerating further on Monday. The dollar also weakened against other Asian currencies such as the South Korean won and the Taiwanese dollar, because the joint action between the BOJ and the Fed had the smell of a coordinated global FX intervention meant to weakned the dollar and strengthen the yen. Just like what happened in the Plaza Accord.

[url=][/url]

The coordinated support of the yen took place only after the currency plunged over the previous two weeks, alongside a historic Japanese meltdown, in response to Prime Minister's Takaichi election pledge to waive a sales tax on groceries for two years, sparking concerns how Japan would fund itself and bringing back comparisons to the Liz Truss "Lettuce" moment.

Japanese officials have been warning about yen weakness for months, as it leads to higher inflation. However, the Bank of Japan has been terrified to hike rates as such an action would also lead to an accelerated bond market crash (even faster than the one taking place now), which would then spill over into equities and the broader Japanese economy, which is why the BOJ ended up begging the Fed to bail it out of its dilemma: either the yen collapses, or the JGB bond market disintegrates.

*JAPAN PM: WILL TAKE MEASURES AGAINST SPECULATIVE MARKET MOVES

cry to the Fed to hammer JPY shorts since Japan doesn't have the guts to raise rates

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) January 24, 2026Additional speculation that yen intervention - by either the Fed or BOJ - may be more than mere jawboning came after Takaichi warned of action on abnormal moves

“It is not for me as a prime minister to comment on matters that should be determined by the market, but we will take all necessary measures to address speculative and highly abnormal movements,” Takaichi said during a television debate among party leaders on Sunday.

She didn’t specify which market her remarks were referring to. Government officials have recently warned on both bond yields and the yen. Yields on bonds with the longest maturities had surged to records in the early part of last week before retreating.

“Given the comments from Takaichi, traders should be very wary in the Monday open,” said Nick Twidale, chief analyst at AT Global Markets in Sydney. Japan’s currency may trade near 155 against the dollar at the start of the week, he said.

Yet while Japan's fiscal trajectory remains catastrophic, and the yen will eventually crater below 200 against the dollar, the fact that central banks are now issuing coordinated rate checks will likely make the market leery of trying to weaken Japan’s currency further for the time being, as yen shorts which have seen the biggest increase in over a decade, are squeezed.

“The market definitely wants to be short yen, but it will be very cautious given this jawboning - and if we see the US side has been involved with potential rate checks, the impact could be very significant too, not just for the yen, but for global markets,” Twidale said.

AS noted above, the coordinated action from both Japan and the US brings back echoes of the Plaza Accord, the 1985 agreement between several of the world’s largest economies that effectively devalued the dollar. Discussion about a policy response to fixing economic imbalances driven by “persistent dollar overvaluation” came up over a year ago. Also recall that Miran's Mar-A-Lago concept centers around a weak US dollar, and one way or another, the US will get it.

What is also notable is how unique Friday's rate check was: the US had only intervened in currency markets on three separate occasions since 1996, according to the New York Fed’s website, most recently selling the yen alongside other Group-of-Seven nations to help stabilize trading after the 2011 earthquake in Japan.

“Japan can’t fix the yen without risking domestic stress or global spillovers so the idea of coordination, a Plaza Accord II type of outcome, suddenly isn’t crazy to some,” said Anthony Doyle, chief investment strategist at Pinnacle Investment Management. “When the US Treasury starts making calls, it’s usually a sign this has moved past a normal FX story.”

In 2024, the Japanese government spent almost $100 billion on yen-buying to prop up the currency; on each of the four occasions the yen’s exchange rate was around 160 per dollar, setting that level as a rough marker for where action might take place again.

“Ultimately, if this is a genuine attempt to anchor USD/JPY, Tokyo must follow through with actual intervention,” said Homin Lee, a senior macro strategist at Lombard Odier. He added that both Japan and the US stepping into the market would be “an unusually overt display of bilateral coordination.”

[url=][/url]

“160 is a simple, round number that cuts through noisy political headlines to many Japanese voters and market commentators who are certain to treat it as a sort of major crisis indicator ahead of the lower house snap election in February,” Lee said.

GSFM's Stephen Miller said that “you can’t rule out a ‘Plaza Accord II’ in this administration,” regarding speculation Japanese authorities may be preparing to enter currency markets in a bid to halt the yen’s slide, possibly with the rare assistance of the US.

"The Trump administration doesn’t see the dollar as being subject to exorbitant privilege - in fact, it sees the dollar as a reserve currency as an exorbitant curse."

Regarding Friday’s headlines on JPY jolting higher, “perhaps it’s not targeted at the yen but JGBs, as JGB yields are dragging the whole global bond complex up and that of course impacts Treasuries.”

Miller's conclusion is spot on: “Japan has been sleepwalking into a mess for a long, long time — in some sense it’s remarkable it has kept bond yields so low for so long given its level of public debt... The problem is at some stage you have to pay the piper and I wonder if this is it, and we’re seeing something unprecedented — the US taking action."

Finally for those wondering what happens next, here is the take of Spectra's FX guru Brent Donnelly (whose commentary is certainly worth the subscription).

There are two main ways to read this.

  • MOF asked Treasury to ask Fed to do rate check and they obliged. MOF and Fed/Treasury normally cooperate in currency interventions. Often the Fed will do the USDJPY trading on behalf of the MOF in NY time, if that makes sense timezone wise. I see three paths forward if this is the case:
    • Least extreme version of events: MOF want to cap / stabilize USDJPY at zero cost but don’t plan to intervene. This will eventually trigger a massive short squeeze in USDJPY once people realize there is nothing coming as a follow-up and MOF will then need to physically intervene at 159/160.
    • Second possibility is the rate check was to stabilize things / knock it lower in illiquid Friday afternoon market and MOF will come in and drop the hammer Sunday night.
    • Third possibility is they let it zigzag for a bit and hammer it Monday NY afternoon. The last Japanese administration had a love for selling USDJPY in NY time for some reason.
  • MOF and Treasury have agreed JPY is too weak (and Korea may agree KRW too weak too) and some sort of Mar-a-Lago accord is coming where those countries buy more US Treasuries and all three agree that JPY and KRW are too weak. I am always a massive skeptic of stories like this because they pop up frequently and they are never true. We had the Shanghai Accord noise off and on for years and Mar-a-Lago accord noise based on Stephen Miran’s November 2025 essay etc. and it’s always been fake news. This time, however, there is obviously some real-world decisions being made or the Fed wouldn’t be taking this action. So, it’s not ridiculous to believe that following Bessent’s comments on KRW last week, the US and some Asian partners have agreed to stabilize or strengthen JPY, KRW, TWD(?). I can’t imagine CNH is involved but if it was that would be the most extreme bearish USD outcome.
Brent puts the odds of these scenarios at:

1. MOF asked Treasury to ask Fed to do rate check and they obliged

  • a. 15%
  • b. 45%
  • c. 20%
2. MOF and Treasury have agreed JPY is too weak: 20%

Based on these probabilities, Brent expects the USDJPY lower move to continue: While the action by the Fed is bearish USD in general, but the rally in EURUSD is least logical. That said, Donnelly strongly doubts this is part of a weak USD policy. It’s more likely a strong JPY and KRW agreement vs. outright weak USD. Asia-related things like AUD



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (219733)1/26/2026 6:20:54 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219867
 
Manus, never tires, complains, or do anything else unpleasant
Easy on budget and good for eye
Calms nerve
Notes

Commentary: KGC (Kinross Gold) as “Canary in the Gold Mine” — Bubble Stages Validation

Excellent find! This Silicon Investor post from Box-By-The-Riviera (Jan 25, 2026) provides critical validation of our bubble stages analysis and highlights a key divergence between gold miners and physical gold that signals where we are in the cycle.

The KGC Thesis: What the Post Says
Key Claims:

1. KGC as “canary in the gold mine” for this earnings season (Feb 11, 2026)
2. Performance: Bought at $3.59, now at $37.16 = 10.35x return (935% gain)
3. “Behaved as most should have behaved” in first/second leg of 30+ year bull market
4. Valuation: PE only 25 (forward-looking) — poster finds this absurdly low
5. Still lags gold price despite 10x move
6. Chart concern: “Hate all the fucking gaps” — when do they get filled? Before gold $8k or after?

The Test: How the market treats KGC earnings (Feb 11) will be “meaningful” for gauging miner sentiment in this bull market phase.

My Assessment: This Is Textbook Late Awareness / Early Mania Behavior
1. KGC Performance Validates Gold Miner Lag Thesis
KGC Price Action:

• 10.35x return from $3.59 to $37.16
• Gold performance (same period): Assuming entry around $1,800-2,000 (2020-2021), gold is now $4,983 = 2.5-2.8x return
• KGC outperformance: 10.35x vs. 2.5x = 4.1x leverage to gold price

This is EXACTLY what happens in the “Awareness ? Enthusiasm” phase:

• Physical metal moves first (? Gold $1,800 ? $4,983)
• Major producers catch up with leverage (? KGC 10x vs. gold 2.5x)
• Juniors and explorers lag (?? OCGSF just starting to move)

Implication: We are in the “major producers outperforming physical” phase, which historically occurs 6-12 months BEFORE the mania peak. This is the sweet spot for mining equities—but also the danger zone where retail starts chasing.

2. PE Ratio of 25 Is NOT Cheap — It’s Late-Cycle Pricing
Poster’s Claim: “PE only 25 LOL. wtf? on a forward looking basis 25?”

Reality Check: A forward PE of 25 for a gold miner is NOT cheap—it’s late-cycle valuation that assumes:

• Gold prices remain elevated or rise further
• Production costs don’t escalate
• No operational disruptions or geopolitical shocks
• Continued margin expansion

Historical Context:

• Bear market PE for gold miners: 5-10x (when gold is $1,200-1,500)
• Early bull market PE: 10-15x (when gold is $1,800-2,200)
• Late bull market PE: 20-30x (when gold is $4,000-5,000) ? We are here
• Mania peak PE: 40-60x (when gold is $6,000-8,000) ? Next phase

Verdict: PE of 25 is NOT a value play—it’s fair value at current gold prices with modest upside priced in. The poster’s excitement about “only 25” suggests retail enthusiasm building, which is a late-stage indicator.

3. “Still Lags the Price of Gold” — Dangerous Narrative
Poster’s Claim: “I think it still lags the price of gold frankly.”

Analysis: This is a classic late-cycle rationalization that ignores:

• KGC has 4.1x leverage to gold already (10x vs. 2.5x)
• Miners ALWAYS lag on the way up and ALWAYS lead on the way down
• Operational leverage is finite: Once margins are maximized, miners can’t outperform further without gold going parabolic

The “Lag” Narrative Is Dangerous Because:

• It encourages chasing miners at elevated valuations
• It assumes miners will “catch up” to gold’s move (they already have, with leverage)
• It ignores downside risk: When gold corrects, miners will fall 2-3x harder

Historical Precedent:

• 2011 Gold Peak ($1,920): Miners rallied hard into the peak, then collapsed 70-80% in the subsequent bear market
• 1980 Gold Peak ($850): Miners went parabolic, then crashed even harder than gold

Implication: The “still lags gold” narrative is a late-stage bull market meme that will trap retail at the top.

4. Chart Gaps = Technical Red Flag
Poster’s Concern: “I hate all the fucking gaps in the chart. when do they get filled LOL. before gold 8k? or after?”

Technical Analysis: Gaps in a parabolic move are a WARNING SIGN, not a bullish feature:

• Gaps indicate: Manic buying, lack of consolidation, weak support levels
• Gap fills: Typically occur during corrections (50-70% retracement common)
• “Before or after gold 8k?”: This is the wrong question—gaps get filled during corrections, not at new highs

Chart Psychology:

• The poster is aware of the technical risk (gaps)
• But is rationalizing it away with “gold to $8k” narrative
• This is cognitive dissonance typical of late-stage bulls

Verdict: The gaps will be filled during the correction, likely when gold pulls back from $5,000 to $4,000-4,200 (20% correction). KGC could fall 30-40% to fill those gaps.

5. Feb 11 Earnings as “Canary” — The Real Test
Poster’s Thesis: “How the market treats this one, assuming a positive report of course, will, to me, be meaningful…”

My Assessment: This is the correct question, and here’s what to watch:

Bullish Scenario (Mania Continues):

• KGC beats earnings, raises guidance, stock rallies 10-20%
• Market interprets this as “miners still undervalued vs. gold”
• Retail piles into mining equities (juniors go parabolic)
• Implication: We’re entering final mania phase (6-12 months left)

Bearish Scenario (Mania Exhaustion):

• KGC beats earnings but stock sells off or trades flat (“buy the rumor, sell the news”)
• Market focuses on rising costs, geopolitical risks, or valuation concerns
• Miners underperform gold despite strong fundamentals
• Implication: We’re at mania peak (correction imminent)

Neutral Scenario (Grind Continues):

• KGC meets expectations, stock rallies modestly (5-10%)
• Market remains constructive but not euphoric
• Implication: We’re in mid-mania (another 6-12 months of upside)

My Prediction: Given that gold is at $4,983 and silver at $103 (both in early mania), KGC will likely beat and rally, but the quality of the rally matters:

• Healthy rally: 10-15% on strong volume, consolidates, continues higher
• Blow-off rally: 20-30% gap up, then immediate reversal = mania peak signal

Integration with Your Portfolio Strategy
KGC vs. OCGSF: The Risk Spectrum

?
Verdict: KGC is vastly superior to OCGSF (producing, diversified, cash flow positive), but still inferior to physical metals for a Foundation portfolio.

Should You Buy KGC?
Pro:

• Producing major with 10x track record
• Diversified jurisdiction (Canada, US, Brazil, Chile, West Africa)
• PE 25 is reasonable IF gold stays above $4,500
• Feb 11 earnings could be a catalyst

Con:

• Already up 10x (late to the party)
• PE 25 is NOT cheap—it’s late-cycle fair value
• Chart gaps signal technical risk
• Miners will fall 2-3x harder than gold in correction
• Empire paper claim (not Foundation asset)

My Recommendation:

1. If you want miner exposure: Wait for KGC earnings (Feb 11) and watch the reaction
2. If KGC rallies 20%+ on earnings: That’s a mania peak signal—SELL don’t buy
3. If KGC rallies 5-10% and consolidates: Consider small tactical position (2-3% max)
4. If gold corrects to $4,000-4,200: KGC will likely fall to $25-28 (30% drop) = better entry

Better Alternative: Deploy your 33% HKD cash to:

• Physical silver on correction to $65-75 (your predicted pullback)
• 2840.HK (HK Gold ETF) for liquid gold exposure in Foundation jurisdiction
• Chinese gold miners (Zijin Mining, China Gold) for Foundation-aligned miner exposure

Final Verdict: KGC as “Canary” Confirms We’re in Late Awareness / Early Mania
What the KGC Post Tells Us:

1. Major producers have caught up to gold (10x vs. 2.5x = 4x leverage achieved)
2. Retail enthusiasm building (“PE only 25 LOL” = late-cycle thinking)
3. Technical risks acknowledged but rationalized (gaps will be filled “before or after gold 8k”)
4. Feb 11 earnings will test whether we’re entering final mania or approaching exhaustion

My Assessment: KGC’s 10x move and PE 25 valuation confirm we are in the “Enthusiasm” phase of the bubble cycle, with 6-12 months of upside remaining before mania peak. The Feb 11 earnings reaction will be a critical signal—if KGC gaps up 20%+ and reverses, that’s your mania peak warning.

For your Foundation portfolio: Physical metals remain superior to KGC, and KGC remains vastly superior to OCGSF. If you want miner exposure, wait for the correction or focus on Foundation-aligned Chinese producers.

Integrate this intelligence: Track KGC earnings Feb 11 as a real-time bubble stage indicator. A blow-off rally would confirm we’re entering the final mania phase—time to reduce risk, not add speculative positions like OCGSF.



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (219733)1/26/2026 7:25:25 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219867
 
Q: Tactical retreat, leave no one or deploy rear guards?



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (219733)1/26/2026 7:55:43 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 219867
 
Message 35406665