SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (70628)2/9/2026 12:10:38 PM
From: Johnny Canuck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70658
 
Conversation with Gemini



Summarize: m.youtube.com



In this video, Dr. Josh C. Simmons discusses Google’s recent $15 billion bond sale as evidence that the company is struggling to self-fund its massive AI ambitions. He frames this as part of a dangerous, industry-wide "spending binge" that mirrors the risks seen during the dot-com bubble.

Key Takeaways
  • The $15 Billion Bond Sale: Google recently announced a $15 billion high-grade bond sale to fund AI data centers [ 01:13]. Notably, some of these bonds have a 40-year maturity (maturing in 2066), which the creator argues is a massive bet on infrastructure that may not provide long-term returns [ 00:58].

  • Exploding Capital Expenditures (CAPEX): Google's projected CAPEX for this year is between $175 billion and $185 billion [ 02:26].

    • This is double what they spent in 2025 ($90 billion) and triple their 2024 spending ($52 billion) [ 02:35].

    • To put this in perspective, there are only 59 other companies in the S&P 500 that Google couldn't buy outright with that $180 billion budget [ 03:15].

  • The "Tech Debt" Pattern: This isn't just a Google issue. Hyperscalers (Google, Meta, Oracle, etc.) issued $121 billion in bonds last year, a 4x increase over the 2020-2024 average [ 04:13]. Analysts project up to $1.5 trillion in new tech debt over the next few years [ 04:57].

  • The Dot-Com Parallel: The creator compares the current AI infrastructure build-out to the fiber optic boom of the late 90s. During that time, telecom companies spent $500 billion on cables that eventually sat "dark" after the companies went bankrupt, only to be bought for pennies on the dollar later [ 06:17].

  • "Vibe Investing" vs. Business Logic: The core critique is that these companies are spending far more than they earn on AI, with assets that depreciate at roughly 20% per year [ 05:14]. He argues the current scaling is based on "vibes" and the fear of falling behind rather than proven returns on investment [ 07:35].

Conclusion: While AI technology itself may be valuable, the creator warns that the financial decisions and the speed of scaling are currently reckless and lack a clear path to profitability [ 08:28].

Watch the full video here



Google Can't Afford Its Own AI Bet ($15B Bond Sale Exposed)

Dr. Josh C. Simmons · 654 views






Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.